Skip to content

Conversation

@pierrewillenbrockdfki
Copy link
Contributor

Of note here is the different meaning of --path between bundle install and bundle binstubs, where the former uses the configuration entry "path", while the later uses "bin", which they are saying in their documentation but are not clear that those refer to the configuration variables.

@pierrewillenbrockdfki
Copy link
Contributor Author

@chhtz maybe you already have tested this locally, so you have an easy way to find if this works?

@chhtz
Copy link
Member

chhtz commented Dec 4, 2025

To me it looks good. I have no idea about the failed unit tests though, nor whether some changes are actually redundant.

Maybe @doudou or @g-arjones can weigh in.

@pierrewillenbrockdfki
Copy link
Contributor Author

The unit test might need #421 to work again, but i am not sure if that is all.

@chhtz chhtz marked this pull request as ready for review December 8, 2025 13:31
@doudou
Copy link
Member

doudou commented Dec 15, 2025

Just extracted the "fix CI" commits from the other PR #426

Of note here is the different meaning of --path between bundle install
and bundle binstubs, where the former uses the configuration entry "path",
while the later uses "bin", which they are saying in their documentation
but are not clear that those refer to the configuration variables.
instead, set the configuration option before and
call bundle binstubs --all afterwards.
@doudou
Copy link
Member

doudou commented Dec 15, 2025

FYI ... just rebased your PR on top of the fix_test_suite branch ... we'd need both to get the CI to pass :(

@doudou doudou mentioned this pull request Dec 15, 2025
@doudou doudou merged commit cc9c9d5 into master Dec 15, 2025
6 checks passed
@doudou doudou deleted the bundler-4 branch December 15, 2025 20:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants