Ensure all files have designated maintainers

[yannl35133]

("All files" doesn't include files that shouldn't have a maintainer)

At the end, I only looked for the team I found most suitable, all changes are suggestions and up to discussion.

Proposed changes in decreasing order of justifications (if not mentioned, they were unassigned):

• /dev/tools/make_git_revision.sh to @rocq-prover/build-maintainers (that appeared to be the case already, but the later assignment of /dev/tools/ overrode it)
• /kernel/pConstraints.* and /kernel/qGraph.* transferred from @rocq-prover/kernel-maintainers to @rocq-prover/universes-maintainers
• /config/ to @rocq-prover/build-maintainers
• /tools/rocqtex* to @silene (as maintainer of /tools/coq_tex.*)
• /tools/rocqwc* to @rocq-prover/coqdoc-maintainers (as maintainer of /tools/coqwc*)
• *.mld to @rocq-prover/doc-maintainers (the commit that added them says they exist for documentation; they might have become useless now)
• /dev/ml_toplevel/ to @rocq-prover/toplevel-maintainers
• *.opam from @rocq-prover/build-maintainers and @erikmd to @rocq-prover/build-maintainers and @Just0606
• *.opam.template to @rocq-prover/build-maintainers and @erikmd as maintainers of *.opam
• /tools/ to @rocq-prover/dev-tools-maintainers (as fallback if no other assignment applies)
• /dev/ to @rocq-prover/dev-tools-maintainers (as fallback if no other assignment applies, this should only be files in no subfolder)
• .gitattributes .gitignore .ocp-indent to @rocq-prover/build-maintainers
• .mailmap CREDITS LICENSE to @rocq-prover/contributing-process-maintainers

I will wait for one person accepting on behalf of a team to consider all concerned changes accepted, and I will probably remove from the PR all propositions that aren't accepted after some time (or those outright refused), I don't intend to push them hard.

[SkySkimmer]

.gitattributes .gitignore .ocp-indent to @rocq-prover/build-maintainers

that doesn't sound right, maybe dev-tools instead

[SkySkimmer]

@erikmd isn't maintaining anymore IIUC

[erikmd]

if @Zimmi48 agrees, I suggest that you replace erikmd with @Justme0606 here

[erikmd]

FWIW, this mention in the CODEOWNERS was useful for the docker-rocq maintainer(s) to be aware soonish of build changes in rocq master, so that the docker-rocq config can be updated earlier, and not after a docker-rocq:dev rebuild failure

[SkySkimmer]

For the teams they can make a PR later if there's a problem but I'd like an explicit ok before merging for people explicitly named: @silene and @Justme0606

[SkySkimmer]

Also for @Justme0606 I think he would need to be part of the organization to get review requests and AFAICT he isn't.

[Justme0606]

For the teams they can make a PR later if there's a problem but I'd like an explicit ok before merging for people explicitly named: @silene and @Justme0606

Sure, no problem. I had discussed the continuity of docker-rocq with Erik, so this is fine with me.