Skip to content

Conversation

@atsampson
Copy link
Contributor

I often want to sort by ctime. (I'm not sure how useful atime is... but "with Times" did show it already.)

The changes are straightforward enough, but I'm a bit antsy about the impact this has on the translations, hence the split commits to optionally keep "Sort by Date" intact.

In addition to the new sort types, this also adds atime and ctime
columns to the list view -- which makes sense, given that the details
view shows atime/ctime when times are shown. I've kept mtime first
because it's the one you're most likely to be interested in.

For consistency, it would make sense to rename "Sort by Date" to "Sort
by Last Modified" (and SORT_DATE to SORT_MTIME), but that would need
changes to all the translations too.
This means we're consistent with the "mtime, atime, ctime" order
everywhere.
... and SORT_DATE to SORT_MTIME. List View already called this column
"Last Modified", so this means the terminology is consistent between the
views, although it'll need changes to the translations.

Backwards compatibility: the numeric value of the option is the same, so
existing Options files will still work, and remote mode accepts "Date"
to mean the same as "LastModified".
@atsampson
Copy link
Contributor Author

I did finally find a use for sort-by-atime a couple of weeks ago, so it's not completely useless!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant