docs(casebook): ecosystem audit edition — 33 verified findings across 71 repos - #15
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Adds the ecosystem-audit edition to the measurement casebook: over 2026-09-06/07 we deep-read 71 repositories (usage tools, observability platforms, eval frameworks, gateways, pricing sources) and filed 33 evidence-backed usage-accounting findings. The new section summarizes the five hazard classes with confirmed-instance counts and links every claim to the public PR/issue.
Honesty rules kept
Why this belongs in the repo
The casebook is the product demo: the same taxonomy and fixture discipline that drive the conformance pack found quantified, verified defects that the targets' own test suites missed. Ends with a pointer to the fixture shapes for tool authors — no AgentMeasure runtime required.