Skip to content

Feat/GBI-2485/Add rsk-monitor as a Docker container#632

Merged
AndresQuijano merged 3 commits intoflyover-2.1.1from
feat/gbi2485/add_rsk_monitor_as_docker_container
Feb 19, 2025
Merged

Feat/GBI-2485/Add rsk-monitor as a Docker container#632
AndresQuijano merged 3 commits intoflyover-2.1.1from
feat/gbi2485/add_rsk_monitor_as_docker_container

Conversation

@AndresQuijano
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@AndresQuijano AndresQuijano commented Feb 14, 2025

What

-Add a Docker container to use rsk-monitor and give metrics about BTC addresses.
-Add a command in the Makefile to easily run the container.

Why

This is part of the delivery strategy of the monitor for Systema

Jira tk

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

github-actions bot commented Feb 14, 2025

Dependency Review

The following issues were found:
  • ✅ 0 vulnerable package(s)
  • ✅ 0 package(s) with incompatible licenses
  • ✅ 0 package(s) with invalid SPDX license definitions
  • ⚠️ 2 package(s) with unknown licenses.
See the Details below.

License Issues

docker-compose/monitoring/package.json

PackageVersionLicenseIssue Type
@rsksmart/rsk-monitor^0.1.0NullUnknown License
@types/node^20.11.19NullUnknown License

OpenSSF Scorecard

PackageVersionScoreDetails
npm/@mempool/mempool.js ^2.3.0 🟢 3.6
Details
CheckScoreReason
Dangerous-Workflow⚠️ -1no workflows found
Token-Permissions⚠️ -1No tokens found
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Maintained⚠️ 23 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 2
Code-Review🟢 5Found 7/12 approved changesets -- score normalized to 5
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ -1no dependencies found
Security-Policy⚠️ 0security policy file not detected
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
License🟢 10license file detected
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Branch-Protection⚠️ 0branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
Vulnerabilities🟢 73 existing vulnerabilities detected
npm/@rsksmart/rsk-monitor ^0.1.0 UnknownUnknown
npm/@types/node ^20.11.19 🟢 6.9
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review🟢 8Found 25/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 8
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) and 2 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
License🟢 9license file detected
Token-Permissions⚠️ 0detected GitHub workflow tokens with excessive permissions
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Vulnerabilities🟢 100 existing vulnerabilities detected
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Pinned-Dependencies🟢 8dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 8
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
npm/ts-node ^10.9.2 🟢 4.2
Details
CheckScoreReason
Code-Review⚠️ 1Found 5/30 approved changesets -- score normalized to 1
Maintained⚠️ 00 commit(s) and 0 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 0
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
Token-Permissions🟢 10GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
License🟢 10license file detected
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Branch-Protection⚠️ 0branch protection not enabled on development/release branches
Signed-Releases⚠️ -1no releases found
Pinned-Dependencies⚠️ 0dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 0
Fuzzing⚠️ 0project is not fuzzed
SAST⚠️ 0SAST tool is not run on all commits -- score normalized to 0
Vulnerabilities⚠️ 047 existing vulnerabilities detected
npm/typescript ^5.3.3 🟢 8.4
Details
CheckScoreReason
Binary-Artifacts🟢 10no binaries found in the repo
Branch-Protection⚠️ -1internal error: error during branchesHandler.setup: internal error: githubv4.Query: Resource not accessible by integration
CI-Tests🟢 1030 out of 30 merged PRs checked by a CI test -- score normalized to 10
CII-Best-Practices⚠️ 0no effort to earn an OpenSSF best practices badge detected
Code-Review🟢 10all changesets reviewed
Contributors🟢 10project has 36 contributing companies or organizations
Dangerous-Workflow🟢 10no dangerous workflow patterns detected
Dependency-Update-Tool🟢 10update tool detected
Fuzzing🟢 10project is fuzzed
License🟢 10license file detected
Maintained🟢 1030 commit(s) and 3 issue activity found in the last 90 days -- score normalized to 10
Packaging⚠️ -1packaging workflow not detected
Pinned-Dependencies🟢 6dependency not pinned by hash detected -- score normalized to 6
SAST🟢 10SAST tool is run on all commits
Security-Policy🟢 10security policy file detected
Signed-Releases⚠️ 0Project has not signed or included provenance with any releases.
Token-Permissions🟢 10GitHub workflow tokens follow principle of least privilege
Vulnerabilities🟢 64 existing vulnerabilities detected

Scanned Files

  • docker-compose/monitoring/package.json

@AndresQuijano AndresQuijano merged commit 4d1ad9e into flyover-2.1.1 Feb 19, 2025
5 checks passed
@AndresQuijano AndresQuijano deleted the feat/gbi2485/add_rsk_monitor_as_docker_container branch February 19, 2025 10:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants