Skip to content

Conversation

@dchristidis
Copy link
Contributor

And various other small improvements.

@ericvaandering
Copy link
Contributor

We have an are running a version of this with prometheus changes as well in #132

I notice you and Maggie chose different SQL statements. No thoughts on which is better, but I'd like to use most of her changes. Can we merge the two changes?

@dchristidis
Copy link
Contributor Author

Maggie’s PR keeps the SQLAlchemy code with either raw text queries or in the 1.4 syntax. This PR ports them to the 2.0 syntax. I can wait for that one to be merged then rework this one on top of it.

@dchristidis
Copy link
Contributor Author

Given that the mentioned PR is being delayed, I believe it would be better for this and #137 to be reviewed. It will reduce Maggie’s future work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants