-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 575
Add CC_PREFER_CLANG_CL_OVER_MSVC environment variable to override prefer_clang_cl_over_msvc
#1675
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
ArchangelX360
wants to merge
1
commit into
rust-lang:main
Choose a base branch
from
ArchangelX360:archangelx360/override_prefer_clang_cl_by_env
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+115
−2
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If I understood correclty,
getenvorgetenv_booleanwon't default to the host environment, so it's not applicable to us here as we actually want to have the host environment leak to us if I'm not mistaken.However, how can I test that? Because tests are run in parallel, so in my current test implementation it just does not work as tests are leaking that env to one another most probably.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See
tests/cc_env.rsThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks I'll implement it that way for now.
Then we can discuss the following here: would it be an acceptable design for you to always propagate
CC_PREFER_CLANG_CL_OVER_MSVCtoself.envin theBuild::newconstructor?There is two advantages to that:
mainfunction trick in tests and rely on settingself.envself.getenv_booleanin the implementation ofBuildCC_FORCE_DISABLEwould be under the same regime too, for example.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not entirely sure I understand the question, but you might wanna wait for #1656 before making too many bold changes to how environment variables work?