-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 77
Sync from rust 2025/06/02 #694
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
antoyo
wants to merge
18
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
sync_from_rust_2025_06_02
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Rename `USED` to `USED_COMPILER` to better reflect its behavior. - Reorder some items to group the used and allocator flags together - Renumber them without gaps
There is no safety contract and I don't think any of them can actually cause UB in more ways than passing malicious source code to rustc can. While LtoModuleCodegen::optimize says that the returned ModuleCodegen points into the LTO module, the LTO module has already been dropped by the time this function returns, so if the returned ModuleCodegen indeed points into the LTO module, we would have seen crashes on every LTO compilation, which we don't. As such the comment is outdated.
atomic_load intrinsic: use const generic parameter for ordering We have a gazillion intrinsics for the atomics because we encode the ordering into the intrinsic name rather than making it a parameter. This is particularly bad for those operations that take two orderings. Let's fix that! This PR only converts `load`, to see if there's any feedback that would fundamentally change the strategy we pursue for the const generic intrinsics. The first two commits are preparation and could be a separate PR if you prefer. `@BoxyUwU` -- I hope this is a use of const generics that is unlikely to explode? All we need is a const generic of enum type. We could funnel it through an integer if we had to but an enum is obviously nicer... `@bjorn3` it seems like the cranelift backend entirely ignores the ordering?
This avoids having to get the function signature.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
TODO: