Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hint at future parts and note the past, e.g. Aristotle #70

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

david-a-wheeler
Copy link

Note early on, in Chapter 4, that later sections of the book will expand TFL to create FOL and then modal logic. I think it helps students to have brief notes, before they dive in, of what will lay ahead.

In addition, briefly note Aristotle, Frege, and Russell. Aristotle is mentioned later, but not why. Many students won't know that Aristotle created logic as an area, and may not even know who Aristotle is (!). Make sure that a reader knows that Aristotle got the study of logic started. Also mention that the logic systems described
in this book are modern logic, which is related to but not the same as Aristotelian logic. Also briefly mention Frege and Russell. While this isn't a history book, it's important for students to learn that this material didn't just get provided by magic, but that instead there were people behind its development and a history of its development.

Signed-off-by: David A. Wheeler [email protected]

Note early on, in Chapter 4, that later sections of the book
will expand TFL to create FOL and then modal logic.
I think it helps students to have brief notes, before they dive in,
of what will lay ahead.

In addition, briefly note Aristotle, Frege, and Russell.
Aristotle is mentioned later, but not *why*. Many students
won't know that Aristotle created logic as an area, and may not
even know who Aristotle is (!). Make sure that a reader
*knows*  that Aristotle got the study of logic started.
Also mention that the logic systems described
in this book are modern logic, which is related to but not the same as
Aristotelian logic. Also briefly mention Frege and Russell.
While this isn't a history book, it's important for students
to learn that this material didn't just get provided by magic,
but that instead there were *people* behind its development
and a *history* of its development.

Signed-off-by: David A. Wheeler <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant