Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feat(Safenet): Update Safenet sidebar #4969

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Feb 14, 2025
Merged

Feat(Safenet): Update Safenet sidebar #4969

merged 12 commits into from
Feb 14, 2025

Conversation

germartinez
Copy link
Member

@germartinez germartinez commented Feb 12, 2025

What it solves

Resolves https://github.com/safe-global/safenet/issues/346

Screenshots

Non-Safenet account

Screenshot 2025-02-14 at 13 00 43

Screenshot 2025-02-14 at 13 00 54

Pure Safenet account

Screenshot 2025-02-14 at 12 59 35

Screenshot 2025-02-14 at 13 00 22

Safenet account + other unsupported chains

Screenshot 2025-02-14 at 13 01 14

Screenshot 2025-02-14 at 13 01 39

Checklist

  • I've tested the branch on mobile 📱
  • I've documented how it affects the analytics (if at all) 📊
  • I've written a unit/e2e test for it (if applicable) 🧑‍💻

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 12, 2025

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 12, 2025

Coverage report for apps/web

St.
Category Percentage Covered / Total
🟡 Statements
74.04% (-0.03% 🔻)
14909/20136
🔴 Branches
51.81% (+0.1% 🔼)
3573/6897
🔴 Functions
56.64% (-0.09% 🔻)
2106/3718
🟡 Lines
75.58% (-0.03% 🔻)
13533/17905
Show new covered files 🐣
St.
File Statements Branches Functions Lines
🟢
... / index.tsx
77.78% 0% 0% 87.5%
Show files with reduced coverage 🔻
St.
File Statements Branches Functions Lines
🔴
... / safenet.ts
37.04% (-1.42% 🔻)
100% 7.69%
36% (-1.5% 🔻)
🟡
... / index.tsx
72.73% (-4.55% 🔻)
75% (-25% 🔻)
60%
71.43% (-4.76% 🔻)
🟡
... / index.tsx
60% (-2.5% 🔻)
0% 0%
65.22% (-2.96% 🔻)
🔴
... / MultiAccountItem.tsx
28.24% (-3.06% 🔻)
0% 0%
32.17% (-2.78% 🔻)

Test suite run success

1794 tests passing in 242 suites.

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 1adf415

@germartinez germartinez marked this pull request as ready for review February 12, 2025 20:28
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 12, 2025

📦 Next.js Bundle Analysis for @safe-global/web

This analysis was generated by the Next.js Bundle Analysis action. 🤖

⚠️ Global Bundle Size Increased

Page Size (compressed)
global 1.06 MB (🟡 +70.6 KB)
Details

The global bundle is the javascript bundle that loads alongside every page. It is in its own category because its impact is much higher - an increase to its size means that every page on your website loads slower, and a decrease means every page loads faster.

Any third party scripts you have added directly to your app using the <script> tag are not accounted for in this analysis

If you want further insight into what is behind the changes, give @next/bundle-analyzer a try!

New Pages Added

The following pages were added to the bundle from the code in this PR:

Page Size (compressed) First Load
/new-safe/safenet-create 27.74 KB 1.08 MB
/settings/safenet 1.97 KB 1.06 MB

Thirty-three Pages Changed Size

The following pages changed size from the code in this PR compared to its base branch:

Page Size (compressed) First Load
/ 508 B (🟢 -2 B) 1.06 MB
/address-book 23.21 KB (🟡 +142 B) 1.08 MB
/apps 35.84 KB (🟡 +2.11 KB) 1.09 MB
/apps/custom 33.9 KB (🟡 +2.12 KB) 1.09 MB
/apps/open 55.74 KB (🟡 +2.13 KB) 1.11 MB
/balances 29.94 KB (🟡 +240 B) 1.09 MB
/balances/nfts 9.55 KB (🟡 +10 B) 1.07 MB
/bridge 2.56 KB (🟡 +2 B) 1.06 MB
/cookie 8.77 KB (🟡 +1 B) 1.07 MB
/home 61.56 KB (🟡 +2.3 KB) 1.12 MB
/new-safe/advanced-create 28.86 KB (🟡 +2.41 KB) 1.09 MB
/new-safe/create 28.31 KB (🟡 +2.72 KB) 1.09 MB
/new-safe/load 6.21 KB (🟡 +123 B) 1.06 MB
/privacy 14.57 KB (🟡 +2 B) 1.07 MB
/settings/appearance 2.28 KB (🟡 +38 B) 1.06 MB
/settings/cookies 1.92 KB (🟡 +46 B) 1.06 MB
/settings/data 1.83 KB (🟡 +43 B) 1.06 MB
/settings/environment-variables 3.32 KB (🟡 +44 B) 1.06 MB
/settings/modules 4.14 KB (🟡 +91 B) 1.06 MB
/settings/notifications 6.37 KB (🟢 -14.95 KB) 1.06 MB
/settings/safe-apps 20.44 KB (🟡 +2.17 KB) 1.08 MB
/settings/security 2.37 KB (🟡 +39 B) 1.06 MB
/settings/setup 30.93 KB (🟡 +197 B) 1.09 MB
/share/safe-app 7.56 KB (🟢 -5 B) 1.07 MB
/swap 761 B (🟡 +1 B) 1.06 MB
/terms 12.93 KB (🟡 +1 B) 1.07 MB
/transactions 99.6 KB (🟡 +3.03 KB) 1.16 MB
/transactions/history 99.56 KB (🟡 +3.03 KB) 1.16 MB
/transactions/messages 60.39 KB (🟡 +2.09 KB) 1.12 MB
/transactions/msg 56.65 KB (🟡 +2.1 KB) 1.11 MB
/transactions/queue 49.5 KB (🟡 +2.1 KB) 1.11 MB
/transactions/tx 48.86 KB (🟡 +2.1 KB) 1.11 MB
/welcome/accounts 409 B (🟡 +2 B) 1.06 MB
Details

Only the gzipped size is provided here based on an expert tip.

First Load is the size of the global bundle plus the bundle for the individual page. If a user were to show up to your website and land on a given page, the first load size represents the amount of javascript that user would need to download. If next/link is used, subsequent page loads would only need to download that page's bundle (the number in the "Size" column), since the global bundle has already been downloaded.

Any third party scripts you have added directly to your app using the <script> tag are not accounted for in this analysis

Next to the size is how much the size has increased or decreased compared with the base branch of this PR. If this percentage has increased by 20% or more, there will be a red status indicator applied, indicating that special attention should be given to this.

@@ -127,6 +129,24 @@ function useMultiAccountItemData(multiSafeAccountItem: MultiChainSafeItem) {

const deployedChainIds = useMemo(() => sortedSafes.map((safe) => safe.chainId), [sortedSafes])

const hasSafenetFeature = useHasSafenetFeature()
const { data: safenetConfig } = useGetSafenetAccountQuery({ safeAddress: address }, { skip: !hasSafenetFeature })
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This request is sent for every account added to the sidebar. The succesful responses are handled by RTK and cached, but the failed ones are not.

This means that this request is sent every time the sidebar is opened for all the non-Safenet accounts, creating a possible issue if there are many Safes added.

We should check if it makes sense to avoid returning an Error 404 when Safes are not found in the service so the response is cached as well.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agree! I think it makes sense to just return an empty response with 200 OK.

Copy link
Contributor

@gjeanmart gjeanmart left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks good from my perspective (I'm not very much familiar with Wallet's codebase)

Comment on lines +12 to +27
return safenetSafes.length > 0 ? (
<Box className={css.safenetList}>
<Box className={css.safenetListHeader}>
{isDarkMode ? <SafenetLogo height="12" /> : <SafenetDarkLogo height="12" />}
</Box>
{safenetSafes.map((safeItem) => (
<SingleAccountItem
onLinkClick={onLinkClick}
safeItem={safeItem}
key={`${safeItem.chainId}:${safeItem.address}`}
isMultiChainItem
isSafenetItem
/>
))}
</Box>
) : undefined
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: you can do this instead

Suggested change
return safenetSafes.length > 0 ? (
<Box className={css.safenetList}>
<Box className={css.safenetListHeader}>
{isDarkMode ? <SafenetLogo height="12" /> : <SafenetDarkLogo height="12" />}
</Box>
{safenetSafes.map((safeItem) => (
<SingleAccountItem
onLinkClick={onLinkClick}
safeItem={safeItem}
key={`${safeItem.chainId}:${safeItem.address}`}
isMultiChainItem
isSafenetItem
/>
))}
</Box>
) : undefined
return safenetSafes.length && (
<Box className={css.safenetList}>
<Box className={css.safenetListHeader}>
{isDarkMode ? <SafenetLogo height="12" /> : <SafenetDarkLogo height="12" />}
</Box>
{safenetSafes.map((safeItem) => (
<SingleAccountItem
onLinkClick={onLinkClick}
safeItem={safeItem}
key={`${safeItem.chainId}:${safeItem.address}`}
isMultiChainItem
isSafenetItem
/>
))}
</Box>
)

@@ -127,6 +129,24 @@ function useMultiAccountItemData(multiSafeAccountItem: MultiChainSafeItem) {

const deployedChainIds = useMemo(() => sortedSafes.map((safe) => safe.chainId), [sortedSafes])

const hasSafenetFeature = useHasSafenetFeature()
const { data: safenetConfig } = useGetSafenetAccountQuery({ safeAddress: address }, { skip: !hasSafenetFeature })
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agree! I think it makes sense to just return an empty response with 200 OK.

@germartinez germartinez merged commit 68a1f8c into safenet Feb 14, 2025
11 of 13 checks passed
@germartinez germartinez deleted the safenet-sidebar branch February 14, 2025 17:55
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 14, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants