Remove list hack

[dlech]

I just published PyWinRT v3.1.0 which fixes the crash that was being worked around, so we can drop the hack of casting the return value to a list.

I also removed the upper limit on the package versions. Experience has show than this can cause problems for people trying to use libraries. I don't expect v4 to have breaking API changes like v3 did anyway.

Finally, the Windows tests that were being skipped are passing for me locally, so not sure if that is something that got fixed too or if it depends on the actual Windows version. We'll see if it passes on CI.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.85%. Comparing base (5dab588) to head (ec87115).
Report is 14 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #222      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.06%   85.85%   +0.78%     
==========================================
  Files          10       10              
  Lines         951      940      -11     
==========================================
- Hits          809      807       -2     
+ Misses        142      133       -9     

Flag	Coverage Δ
pytest	85.85% <100.00%> (+0.78%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[samschott]

I just published PyWinRT v3.1.0 which fixes the crash that was being worked around, so we can drop the hack of casting the return value to a list.

Thank you so much! I was planning to create a bug for this but did not get around to it yet.

I also removed the upper limit on the package versions. Experience has show than this can cause problems for people trying to use libraries. I don't expect v4 to have breaking API changes like v3 did anyway.

Thanks for the assurances. I much prefer not setting an upper limit as well.

Finally, the Windows tests that were being skipped are passing for me locally, so not sure if that is something that got fixed too or if it depends on the actual Windows version. We'll see if it passes on CI.

CI seems to pass. IIRC, this may have been an issue with how the remove API was called which was fixed in the last release.