Skip to content

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Jan 28, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Update Change
lockFileMaintenance All locks refreshed

🔧 This Pull Request updates lock files to use the latest dependency versions.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - On day 1 of the month, every 12 months ( * * 1 */12 * ) (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate using a curated preset maintained by Sanity. View repository job log here

@renovate renovate bot requested review from a team, iamkevingreen, kenjonespizza and kmelve as code owners January 28, 2026 12:41
@renovate renovate bot requested review from juice49 and removed request for a team January 28, 2026 12:41
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 28, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio Ready Ready Preview, Comment Feb 9, 2026 3:10pm
test-studio Ready Ready Preview, Comment Feb 9, 2026 3:10pm
3 Skipped Deployments
Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
e2e-studio Ignored Ignored Feb 9, 2026 3:10pm
studio-workshop Ignored Ignored Preview Feb 9, 2026 3:10pm
test-next-studio Ignored Ignored Feb 9, 2026 3:10pm

Request Review

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 28, 2026

🧪 E2E Preview environment

🔑 Environment Variables for Local Testing

This is the preview URL for the E2E tests: https://e2e-studio-1xe1cdup7.sanity.dev

To run the E2E tests locally, you can use the following environment variables, then run pnpm test:e2e --ui to open the Playwright test runner.

💬 Remember to build the project first with pnpm build:e2e.

  SANITY_E2E_PROJECT_ID=ittbm412
  SANITY_E2E_BASE_URL=https://e2e-studio-1xe1cdup7.sanity.dev
  SANITY_E2E_DATASET="update depending the project you want to test (pr-11997-chromium-21830370262 || pr-11997-firefox-21830370262 )"
  SANITY_E2E_DATASET_CHROMIUM=pr-11997-chromium-21830370262
  SANITY_E2E_DATASET_FIREFOX=pr-11997-firefox-21830370262

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 28, 2026

📊 Playwright Test Report

Download Full E2E Report

This report contains test results, including videos of failing tests.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 28, 2026

⚡️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Mon, 09 Feb 2026 15:17:18 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest
experiment
latency of this branch
Δ (%)
latency difference
article (title) 34.5 efps (29ms) 30.3 efps (33ms) +4ms (+13.8%)
article (body) 50.6 efps (20ms) 48.1 efps (21ms) +1ms (+5.3%)
article (string inside object) 47.6 efps (21ms) 40.0 efps (25ms) +4ms (+19.0%)
article (string inside array) 40.0 efps (25ms) 40.0 efps (25ms) +0ms (-/-%)
recipe (name) 90.9 efps (11ms) 99.9+ efps (10ms) -1ms (-/-%)
recipe (description) 50.0 efps (20ms) 47.6 efps (21ms) +1ms (+5.0%)
recipe (instructions) 99.9+ efps (10ms) 99.9+ efps (9ms) -1ms (-/-%)
singleString (stringField) 99.9+ efps (7ms) 99.9+ efps (6ms) -1ms (-/-%)
synthetic (title) 58.8 efps (17ms) 58.8 efps (17ms) +0ms (-/-%)
synthetic (string inside object) 58.8 efps (17ms) 47.6 efps (21ms) +4ms (+23.5%) 🔴

efps — editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 29ms 33ms 48ms 77ms 70ms 8.1s
article (body) 20ms 31ms 41ms 100ms 290ms 5.7s
article (string inside object) 21ms 24ms 27ms 68ms 1ms 6.4s
article (string inside array) 25ms 30ms 50ms 63ms 7ms 6.8s
recipe (name) 11ms 14ms 16ms 47ms 0ms 5.4s
recipe (description) 20ms 22ms 26ms 45ms 0ms 4.6s
recipe (instructions) 10ms 12ms 14ms 57ms 0ms 3.4s
singleString (stringField) 7ms 10ms 11ms 21ms 0ms 4.5s
synthetic (title) 17ms 21ms 26ms 96ms 1177ms 9.7s
synthetic (string inside object) 17ms 23ms 48ms 92ms 1241ms 9.1s

🧪 Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 33ms 42ms 66ms 95ms 112ms 8.7s
article (body) 21ms 28ms 33ms 96ms 246ms 5.6s
article (string inside object) 25ms 30ms 34ms 66ms 3ms 6.6s
article (string inside array) 25ms 28ms 46ms 70ms 21ms 7.3s
recipe (name) 10ms 12ms 16ms 40ms 0ms 5.2s
recipe (description) 21ms 24ms 26ms 34ms 0ms 4.5s
recipe (instructions) 9ms 13ms 15ms 48ms 0ms 3.4s
singleString (stringField) 6ms 9ms 11ms 20ms 1ms 4.5s
synthetic (title) 17ms 20ms 23ms 91ms 1357ms 9.2s
synthetic (string inside object) 21ms 27ms 48ms 91ms 1179ms 9.4s

📚 Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark — the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency — the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 — the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 — the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 — the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time — the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration — how long the test run took to complete.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 28, 2026

Coverage Report

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
🔵 Lines 37.64% 22173 / 58899
🔵 Statements 32.39% 26826 / 82811
🔵 Functions 39.18% 4519 / 11532
🔵 Branches 24.74% 17560 / 70963
File CoverageNo changed files found.
Generated in workflow #51882 for commit eb59918 by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch from 3b2737d to cfc8030 Compare January 28, 2026 17:34
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch from cfc8030 to 3452537 Compare January 28, 2026 17:51
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch from 3452537 to 8f08b03 Compare January 29, 2026 10:42
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch from 8f08b03 to c1b2fa1 Compare January 29, 2026 10:50
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch from c1b2fa1 to b046632 Compare January 29, 2026 11:01
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/lock-file-maintenance branch from b046632 to 9af92ab Compare January 29, 2026 11:45
@socket-security
Copy link

socket-security bot commented Feb 6, 2026

Warning

Review the following alerts detected in dependencies.

According to your organization's Security Policy, it is recommended to resolve "Warn" alerts. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

Action Severity Alert  (click "▶" to expand/collapse)
Warn High
Obfuscated code: npm eslint-plugin-boundaries is 98.0% likely obfuscated

Confidence: 0.98

Location: Package overview

From: packages/sanity/package.jsonnpm/eslint-plugin-boundaries@5.4.0

ℹ Read more on: This package | This alert | What is obfuscated code?

Next steps: Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support@socket.dev.

Suggestion: Packages should not obfuscate their code. Consider not using packages with obfuscated code.

Mark the package as acceptable risk. To ignore this alert only in this pull request, reply with the comment @SocketSecurity ignore npm/eslint-plugin-boundaries@5.4.0. You can also ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all. To ignore an alert for all future pull requests, use Socket's Dashboard to change the triage state of this alert.

View full report

jordanl17
jordanl17 previously approved these changes Feb 6, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant