Skip to content

Conversation

@squiggler
Copy link
Contributor

@squiggler squiggler bot commented May 5, 2025

I ran pnpm dedupe πŸ§‘β€πŸ’»

@squiggler squiggler bot requested a review from a team as a code owner May 5, 2025 09:15
@squiggler squiggler bot requested review from pedrobonamin and removed request for a team May 5, 2025 09:15
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented May 5, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git β†—οΈŽ

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
page-building-studio βœ… Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview πŸ’¬ Add feedback May 5, 2025 9:24am
performance-studio βœ… Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview May 5, 2025 9:24am
test-studio βœ… Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview πŸ’¬ Add feedback May 5, 2025 9:24am
3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
e2e-studio ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) May 5, 2025 9:24am
studio-workshop ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview May 5, 2025 9:24am
test-next-studio ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) May 5, 2025 9:24am

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 5, 2025

No changes to documentation

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 5, 2025

⚑️ Editor Performance Report

Updated Mon, 05 May 2025 09:34:38 GMT

Benchmark reference
latency of sanity@latest
experiment
latency of this branch
Ξ” (%)
latency difference
article (title) 25.6 efps (39ms) 26.3 efps (38ms) -1ms (-2.6%) βœ…
article (body) 53.1 efps (19ms) 50.3 efps (20ms) +1ms (+5.6%) βœ…
article (string inside object) 28.2 efps (36ms) 27.0 efps (37ms) +2ms (+4.2%) βœ…
article (string inside array) 24.4 efps (41ms) 23.3 efps (43ms) +2ms (+4.9%) βœ…
recipe (name) 45.5 efps (22ms) 44.4 efps (23ms) +1ms (+2.3%) βœ…
recipe (description) 50.0 efps (20ms) 50.0 efps (20ms) +0ms (-/-%) βœ…
recipe (instructions) 99.9+ efps (6ms) 99.9+ efps (6ms) +0ms (-/-%) βœ…
synthetic (title) 17.9 efps (56ms) 18.5 efps (54ms) -2ms (-3.6%) βœ…
synthetic (string inside object) 18.2 efps (55ms) 17.5 efps (57ms) +2ms (+3.6%) βœ…

efps β€” editor "frames per second". The number of updates assumed to be possible within a second.

Derived from input latency. efps = 1000 / input_latency

Detailed information

🏠 Reference result

The performance result of sanity@latest

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 39ms 46ms 62ms 257ms 343ms 10.5s
article (body) 19ms 22ms 33ms 180ms 318ms 5.9s
article (string inside object) 36ms 37ms 43ms 48ms 6ms 6.7s
article (string inside array) 41ms 45ms 48ms 255ms 335ms 7.5s
recipe (name) 22ms 24ms 29ms 43ms 0ms 8.3s
recipe (description) 20ms 24ms 27ms 37ms 0ms 5.2s
recipe (instructions) 6ms 9ms 10ms 26ms 0ms 3.2s
synthetic (title) 56ms 61ms 66ms 327ms 1265ms 14.5s
synthetic (string inside object) 55ms 60ms 70ms 522ms 1235ms 9.0s

πŸ§ͺ Experiment result

The performance result of this branch

Benchmark latency p75 p90 p99 blocking time test duration
article (title) 38ms 40ms 49ms 92ms 54ms 9.8s
article (body) 20ms 23ms 31ms 213ms 274ms 5.6s
article (string inside object) 37ms 40ms 46ms 232ms 255ms 7.2s
article (string inside array) 43ms 46ms 58ms 238ms 296ms 7.5s
recipe (name) 23ms 24ms 32ms 49ms 0ms 8.8s
recipe (description) 20ms 23ms 30ms 57ms 0ms 5.1s
recipe (instructions) 6ms 8ms 10ms 12ms 0ms 3.1s
synthetic (title) 54ms 57ms 63ms 249ms 871ms 14.1s
synthetic (string inside object) 57ms 59ms 63ms 203ms 1036ms 8.9s

πŸ“š Glossary

column definitions

  • benchmark β€” the name of the test, e.g. "article", followed by the label of the field being measured, e.g. "(title)".
  • latency β€” the time between when a key was pressed and when it was rendered. derived from a set of samples. the median (p50) is shown to show the most common latency.
  • p75 β€” the 75th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 75% of the sampled inputs in this benchmark were processed faster than this value. this provides insight into the upper range of typical performance.
  • p90 β€” the 90th percentile of the input latency in the test run. 90% of the sampled inputs were faster than this. this metric helps identify slower interactions that occurred less frequently during the benchmark.
  • p99 β€” the 99th percentile of the input latency in the test run. only 1% of sampled inputs were slower than this. this represents the worst-case scenarios encountered during the benchmark, useful for identifying potential performance outliers.
  • blocking time β€” the total time during which the main thread was blocked, preventing user input and UI updates. this metric helps identify performance bottlenecks that may cause the interface to feel unresponsive.
  • test duration β€” how long the test run took to complete.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 5, 2025

πŸ§ͺ E2E Preview environment

πŸ”‘ Environment Variables for Local Testing

This is the preview URL for the E2E tests: https://e2e-studio-mffw6wrln.sanity.dev

To run the E2E tests locally, you can use the following environment variables, then run pnpm test:e2e --ui to open the Playwright test runner.

πŸ’¬ Remember to build the project first with pnpm build:e2e.

  SANITY_E2E_PROJECT_ID=ittbm412
  SANITY_E2E_BASE_URL=https://e2e-studio-mffw6wrln.sanity.dev
  SANITY_E2E_DATASET="update depending the project you want to test (pr-9337-chromium-14833113186 || pr-9337-firefox-14833113186 )"
  SANITY_E2E_DATASET_CHROMIUM=pr-9337-chromium-14833113186
  SANITY_E2E_DATASET_FIREFOX=pr-9337-firefox-14833113186

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 5, 2025

Coverage Report

Status Category Percentage Covered / Total
πŸ”΅ Lines 43.26% 57657 / 133272
πŸ”΅ Statements 43.26% 57657 / 133272
πŸ”΅ Functions 47.7% 2880 / 6037
πŸ”΅ Branches 79.61% 10720 / 13464
File CoverageNo changed files found.
Generated in workflow #34620 for commit 412531e by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented May 5, 2025

πŸ“Š Playwright Test Report

Download Full E2E Report

This report contains test results, including videos of failing tests.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant