Best practices for filtering cells based on prediction scores after Label Transfer (scATAC → scRNA) #10141
Unanswered
cmj-dresen
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi everyone,
I’m using the LabelTransfer function to annotate a scATAC-seq dataset based on a matching scRNA-seq reference. The overall certainty of the transferred labels is quite high, with over 92% of cells having a prediction score > 0.5.
I’ve noticed that some people further filter cells based on these prediction scores. However, when I apply such filtering, it disproportionately affects smaller cell populations (which I’m not particularly interested in) and samples with lower total cell counts.
I’ve already performed stringent doublet filtering. However, since I unintentionally overloaded the chip, some of the low-confidence cells may be still doublets, even though they don’t show high doublet enrichment scores.
My question:
Is there a generally accepted best practice for filtering based on prediction scores after LabelTransfer?
Thanks in advance for any advice or references!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions