You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is it to be expected that single-modality and multiome RNA-seq data are very difficult to batch-correct?
The leftmost plot shows no correction (the left blob are RNA data from two multi-experiments, the right blob are RNA data from two single-modality experiments), the next plot to the right plot shows the same with Seurat integration. Liger (third from left) performs similarly, Harmony (rightmost plot) slightly better, but the populations still don't really merge.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Is it to be expected that single-modality and multiome RNA-seq data are very difficult to batch-correct?
The leftmost plot shows no correction (the left blob are RNA data from two multi-experiments, the right blob are RNA data from two single-modality experiments), the next plot to the right plot shows the same with Seurat integration. Liger (third from left) performs similarly, Harmony (rightmost plot) slightly better, but the populations still don't really merge.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions