Improvement/bb 642 remove dmf specific location handling

[KillianG]

This change has been tested with zenko CI and on a real platform, I didn't see any issue

[bert-e]

Hello killiang,

My role is to assist you with the merge of this
pull request. Please type @bert-e help to get information
on this process, or consult the user documentation.

Available options

name	description	privileged	authored
/after_pull_request	Wait for the given pull request id to be merged before continuing with the current one.
/bypass_author_approval	Bypass the pull request author's approval	⭐
/bypass_build_status	Bypass the build and test status	⭐
/bypass_commit_size	Bypass the check on the size of the changeset TBA	⭐
/bypass_incompatible_branch	Bypass the check on the source branch prefix	⭐
/bypass_jira_check	Bypass the Jira issue check	⭐
/bypass_peer_approval	Bypass the pull request peers' approval	⭐
/bypass_leader_approval	Bypass the pull request leaders' approval	⭐
/approve	Instruct Bert-E that the author has approved the pull request.		✍️
/create_pull_requests	Allow the creation of integration pull requests.
/create_integration_branches	Allow the creation of integration branches.
/no_octopus	Prevent Wall-E from doing any octopus merge and use multiple consecutive merge instead
/unanimity	Change review acceptance criteria from one reviewer at least to all reviewers
/wait	Instruct Bert-E not to run until further notice.

Available commands

name	description	privileged
/help	Print Bert-E's manual in the pull request.
/status	Print Bert-E's current status in the pull request TBA
/clear	Remove all comments from Bert-E from the history TBA
/retry	Re-start a fresh build TBA
/build	Re-start a fresh build TBA
/force_reset	Delete integration branches & pull requests, and restart merge process from the beginning.
/reset	Try to remove integration branches unless there are commits on them which do not appear on the source branch.

Status report is not available.

[KillianG]

/approve

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 71.13%. Comparing base (761d51a) to head (87851db).
Report is 1 commits behind head on development/9.0.

Additional details and impacted files

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
extensions/lifecycle/LifecycleQueuePopulator.js	56.45% <ø> (+0.06%)	⬆️

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

Components	Coverage Δ
Bucket Notification	75.37% <ø> (ø)
Core Library	75.84% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
Ingestion	68.97% <ø> (+0.35%)	⬆️
Lifecycle	76.16% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
Oplog Populator	85.06% <ø> (ø)
Replication	57.79% <ø> (ø)
Bucket Scanner	85.60% <ø> (ø)

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           development/9.0    #2613      +/-   ##
===================================================
+ Coverage            71.11%   71.13%   +0.01%     
===================================================
  Files                  201      201              
  Lines                13334    13332       -2     
===================================================
+ Hits                  9483     9484       +1     
+ Misses                3841     3838       -3     
  Partials                10       10              

Flag	Coverage Δ
api:retry	9.52% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
api:routes	9.34% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
bucket-scanner	85.60% <ø> (ø)
ingestion	12.27% <ø> (+0.03%)	⬆️
lib	7.36% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
lifecycle	18.84% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
notification	1.07% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
replication	18.63% <ø> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
unit	48.14% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

[bert-e]

I have successfully merged the changeset of this pull request
into targetted development branches:

• ✔️ development/9.0

The following branches have NOT changed:

• development/7.10
• development/7.4
• development/7.70
• development/8.6

Please check the status of the associated issue BB-642.

Goodbye killiang.

The following options are set: approve