feat: LHEInit.fromstring

[APN-Pucky]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 95.08197% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 94.73%. Comparing base (05968e4) to head (d1365e0).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/pylhe/__init__.py	95.08%	1 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #283      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.87%   94.73%   +2.86%     
==========================================
  Files           2        2              
  Lines         320      323       +3     
  Branches       64       67       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits          294      306      +12     
+ Misses         17       10       -7     
+ Partials        9        7       -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests-3.10	94.73% <95.08%> (+2.86%)	⬆️
unittests-3.11	94.73% <95.08%> (+2.86%)	⬆️
unittests-3.12	94.73% <95.08%> (+2.86%)	⬆️
unittests-3.13	94.73% <95.08%> (+2.86%)	⬆️
unittests-3.8	94.73% <95.08%> (+2.86%)	⬆️
unittests-3.9	94.73% <95.08%> (+2.86%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[APN-Pucky]

I am not sure why the coverage decreases... The functions are the same and I added even more to the tests.

[eduardo-rodrigues]

Hi @APN-Pucky, it seems it is because of the extra "branching" introduced with exceptions and if-then's. Not a huge difference. Dunnot if that's trivial for you to add some little tests similar to the one you added, where you provoke an exception, for example?

Otherwise this seems ready, nice 👍.

(I will be slow for the remainder of the week, at a workshop.)