-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
Modernize packaging #157
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Modernize packaging #157
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #157 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 96.08% 96.08%
=======================================
Files 3 3
Lines 894 894
Branches 141 141
=======================================
Hits 859 859
Misses 14 14
Partials 21 21 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
I think we'd prefer moving from setuptools to hatchling while doing this, can you include that or should we do this separately? |
I usually prefer setuptools for projects if they have an existing config already but sure that can be changed. See 19da367. I've compared the sdist and wheel to the one generated with setuptools and it looks fine. Would be great if you could double check that. |
Thanks, this looks good except that it packaged the |
Yes, they should be. Fixed in fb04b83. Would you mind checking it again? |
pyproject.toml
BSD-3-Clause
https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause.html
include_package_data=True
-> it's the default forpyproject.toml
configsMetadata diff