Skip to content

Conversation

@Thegaram
Copy link

@Thegaram Thegaram commented Nov 3, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated CI workflow permissions to be more restrictive.
    • Adjusted checkout behavior to avoid persisting repository credentials between steps.
    • Added a new test step in CI to validate environment variable handling during builds.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 3, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@Thegaram has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 19 minutes and 11 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6e2db89 and d9d2317.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/bump_version.yml (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

Workflow .github/workflows/bump_version.yml was modified: checkout permissions and credential behavior changed, the checkout ref line was commented out, and a new "Run test" step was inserted that echoes secrets.TEST_VALUE via an environment variable before the existing "check diff" step.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
GitHub workflow
.github/workflows/bump_version.yml
Removed write permission on contents in workflow permissions (now empty), commented-out the checkout ref line, set persist-credentials: false for checkout, and added a new Run test step that sets VALUE from secrets.TEST_VALUE and echoes it (inserted before the existing check diff step).

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Runner as GitHub Actions Runner
    participant Checkout as actions/checkout
    participant Step as "Run test" step
    participant Next as Remaining steps (e.g., check diff)

    Runner->>Checkout: start checkout (persist-credentials: false)\n(ref line commented)
    Checkout-->>Runner: workspace prepared
    Runner->>Step: run with env VALUE=secrets.TEST_VALUE
    Step-->>Runner: echo VALUE
    Runner->>Next: continue to subsequent steps (check diff, etc.)
    Note over Checkout,Step: Permissions: workflow permissions `contents` removed/empty
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

  • Changes touch a single workflow file but alter credentials/permissions and introduce a step that exposes a secret to a shell command — review should focus on security implications and intended placement.
  • Areas to review closely:
    • The effect of removing contents write permission and whether other steps rely on it.
    • persist-credentials: false impact on subsequent actions that may need git auth.
    • The new Run test step echoing a secret — ensure echoing the secret is intentional and not leaking logs.

Poem

🐇 I hopped into the YAML night,
A tiny test step, bold and bright,
I whispered a secret into the air,
Then scurried on to check the diff with care,
Hop-hop — the workflow's feeling light!

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The pull request description is completely missing. The repository template requires multiple sections including: (1) Purpose or design rationale of the PR, (2) PR title validation, (3) Deployment tag versioning confirmation, and (4) Breaking change label assessment. Without any description, these required sections are absent and cannot be evaluated. Add a comprehensive pull request description that includes all required sections from the template: explain the purpose and design rationale for testing the GitHub Actions workflow, confirm whether deployment versioning was updated in params/version.go, and specify whether this is a breaking change. This will provide reviewers with essential context about the changes.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The pull request title 'feat: test GA' follows the conventional commits specification with the 'feat' type prefix as required by the repository template. It is concise and directly relates to the changeset, which adds a test step to the GitHub Actions workflow. The title clearly indicates the primary change involves testing GitHub Actions functionality.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 150cba3 and 6e2db89.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/bump_version.yml (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: test

@Thegaram Thegaram closed this Nov 3, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant