-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 175
fix: unbound dask #2053
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: unbound dask #2053
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2053 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 85.69% 85.56% -0.14%
==========================================
Files 46 46
Lines 7090 7092 +2
==========================================
- Hits 6076 6068 -8
- Misses 1014 1024 +10
|
a6112f5
to
bdb3479
Compare
tests/test_dask_view_mem.py
Outdated
# For example from dask.random we allocate 1mb | ||
@pytest.mark.usefixtures("_alloc_cache") | ||
@pytest.mark.limit_memory("1.5 MB") | ||
@pytest.mark.limit_memory("1.6 MB") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure what happened here, but looking at the failure stack-trace, this isn't a hallucination i.e., the total bytes add up. Why this changed, I don't know, but I don't know if it is worth jumping into this rabbit hole.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some questions and an issue with the test. The code changes look good!
Co-authored-by: Philipp A. <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ilan Gold <[email protected]>
Blocked by dask/dask#12026I think I need to be more careful with upper bounds...
All good now! The scipy PR I mention in the comment is important, but not something that is either core to our internal functionality or unworkable. So I think this PR is good to go1