docs: document array type support#3895
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3895 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 69.09% 76.80% +7.70%
==========================================
Files 116 117 +1
Lines 12403 12441 +38
==========================================
+ Hits 8570 9555 +985
+ Misses 3833 2886 -947
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
|
|
How hard would it be to make an overview page that lists all functions in a single table? |
|
@flying-sheep I'll try to look tomorrow more closely but I do like @grst's suggestion. That being said, I don't think it should be instead of what is here, this is really cool! |
|
Can you draft how that would look like? Tables for something like PCA are already quite big, and I can’t imagine how to lay out one big table in a way that it would be clear what’s going on.
|
|
I had in mind something like this ✅ = supported
|
|
@flying-sheep I have not checked how this work or not. But do umap and tsne work with sp_matrix and arrays? |
|
Yes! In
Thanks, thinking like this is exactly the reason I requested your reviews! Could have easily been that I messed this up. |
Co-authored-by: Ilan Gold <ilanbassgold@gmail.com>
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
|
OK, all fixed.
compare the tables:
only thing left to do (but I probably won’t) would be to make it read |


I double-checked everything in #2578 and mostly winged it for the rest.
Would be nice if one of you could take a look if I mis-specified something.
highly_variable_genessupports only CSR. Any idea?csras “not supporting csc”, except when that’s conditional (i.esc.pp.scalesupports CSC if you don’t specifymask_obs, so that’s detailed inmask_obs).