feat: add rustls-no-provider-no-roots feature - #3008
Open
theawless wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Author
|
@seanmonstar I also have a tinier commit that doesn't introduce This diff allows power users to choose 0.12 was super easy to cross compile and I hope we can have 0.13 do the same as well. |
Add a feature flag to use rustls without a crypto provider and without rustls-platform-verifier, for users who provide their own crypto provider and certificates via tls_certs_only(). This avoids pulling in platform-native dependencies that are problematic for cross-compilation and environments like Android where JNI initialization is required. Closes seanmonstar#2948 Closes seanmonstar#2968
|
Is there any movement here? The merge of this PR would also be extremely helpful for us. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Implemented suggestion mentioned here: #2968 (comment)
Add a feature flag to use rustls without a crypto provider and without rustls-platform-verifier, for users who provide their own crypto provider and certificates via
tls_certs_only().This avoids pulling in platform-native dependencies that are problematic for cross-compilation and environments like Android where JNI initialization is required.
Closes #2948
Closes #2968