Skip to content

chore(deps): update dependency pymdown-extensions to v10.21.3 [security]#849

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/pypi-pymdown-extensions-vulnerability
Open

chore(deps): update dependency pymdown-extensions to v10.21.3 [security]#849
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
renovate/pypi-pymdown-extensions-vulnerability

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@renovate renovate Bot commented May 19, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
pymdown-extensions 10.21.210.21.3 age confidence

Regression in pymdownx.snippets reintroduces sibling-prefix path traversal bypass despite restrict_base_path

CVE-2026-46338 / GHSA-62q4-447f-wv8h

More information

Details

Summary

pymdownx.snippets has a regression of the CVE-2023-32309 / GHSA-jh85-wwv9-24hv fix. With restrict_base_path: True (the default), the current filename.startswith(base) containment check does not enforce a directory boundary. As a result, a markdown snippet directive can read files from sibling paths that share the same prefix as base_path, such as docs vs docs_internal.

The regression was introduced in PR #​2039 / commit 7c13bda5b7793b172efd1abb6712e156a83fe07d, which replaced the original directory-identity check with a plain string-prefix comparison.

Details

The regression was introduced in commit 7c13bda5b7793b172efd1abb6712e156a83fe07d (2023-05-15, #​2039 "Fix regression of snippets nested deeply under specified base path"), which relaxed the original os.path.samefile(base, os.path.dirname(filename)) check to a plain startswith(base).

SnippetPreprocessor.get_snippet_path() in pymdownx/snippets.py:

if self.restrict_base_path:
    filename = os.path.abspath(os.path.join(base, path))
    # If the absolute path is no longer under the specified base path, reject the file
    if not filename.startswith(base):
        continue

base is os.path.abspath(b) and has no trailing separator. str.startswith(base) is True for any filename whose string representation begins with the same characters as base, regardless of whether those characters end at a directory boundary.

Concrete example:

  • base = "/x/docs"
  • path = "../docs_secret/leak.txt" (inside the markdown snippet directive)
  • os.path.join(base, path)"/x/docs/../docs_secret/leak.txt"
  • os.path.abspath(...)"/x/docs_secret/leak.txt"
  • filename.startswith(base)True, because "/x/docs_secret/..." begins with the literal string "/x/docs".

All releases from 10.0.1 (2023-05-15) through 10.21.2 (current) are affected.

Impact

Arbitrary file read within the host the build runs on, bounded by the prefix match. With base_path = /x/docs the attacker can read files from any sibling directory whose path begins with the literal string /x/docs followed by any non-separator character — for example /x/docs_internal/, /x/docs.bak/, /x/docs2/.

The threat model is the same as the original CVE-2023-32309: markdown content processed by the snippets preprocessor in a build pipeline (typical scenario: an MkDocs documentation site built in CI from PR contributions or otherwise less-trusted markdown) can read files outside the configured base. CI builds that publish the generated HTML expose the read file to the public; CI builds with secrets on disk leak those secrets.

Reproduction

Minimal local PoC, non-destructive:

import os, shutil, tempfile, markdown

work = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="pmx_poc_")
try:
    base    = os.path.join(work, "docs")
    sibling = os.path.join(work, "docs_secret")
    os.makedirs(base)
    os.makedirs(sibling)
    with open(os.path.join(sibling, "leak.txt"), "w") as f:
        f.write("TOP_SECRET_FROM_SIBLING_DIR\n")

    out = markdown.markdown(
        '--8<-- "../docs_secret/leak.txt"\n',
        extensions=["pymdownx.snippets"],
        extension_configs={
            "pymdownx.snippets": {
                "base_path": [base],
                "restrict_base_path": True,
                "check_paths": True,
            }
        },
    )
    print(out)  # -> <p>TOP_SECRET_FROM_SIBLING_DIR</p>
finally:
    shutil.rmtree(work)

Default restrict_base_path: True is sufficient — no non-default option is required.

Suggested fix

Minimal change — require the separator after the base prefix:

-                        if not filename.startswith(base):
+                        # Append `os.sep` so a sibling directory whose name shares a prefix
+                        # (e.g. `/x/docs` vs `/x/docs_evil`) cannot satisfy the check.
+                        if not filename.startswith(base + os.sep):
                             continue

This preserves the original intent (allow snippets nested at any depth under base_path) while restoring the directory-boundary check. It does not affect the os.path.isdir(base) branch where base is a file (that branch still uses os.path.samefile).

Alternative: os.path.commonpath([base, filename]) == base is equivalent and slightly more idiomatic, though it raises ValueError on different drives on Windows and would need a try/except. The startswith(base + os.sep) fix is the smaller diff.

Note: this fix does not change behaviour for symlinks inside base_path. The existing implementation uses os.path.abspath (not os.path.realpath), so a symlink within base_path pointing outside is still followed. That is a separate concern — symlinks require write access to base_path, a much higher bar than the current bypass — and matches the behaviour the CVE-2023 fix established.

Regression test

A regression test class TestSnippetsSiblingPrefix was added in tests/test_extensions/test_snippets.py. It uses tests/test_extensions/_snippets/nested as base_path and a new fixture directory tests/test_extensions/_snippets/nested_sibling_evil/leak.txt. It asserts that the markdown directive --8<-- "../nested_sibling_evil/leak.txt" raises SnippetMissingError.

  • Without fix: test fails (AssertionError: SnippetMissingError not raised, sibling file is silently read).
  • With fix: test passes.

Full suite: python -m pytest tests/ -q738 passed (737 baseline + 1 new regression test). No regressions.

Affected versions

>= 10.0.1, <= 10.21.2

Severity

  • CVSS Score: 4.3 / 10 (Medium)
  • Vector String: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

References

This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).


Release Notes

facelessuser/pymdown-extensions (pymdown-extensions)

v10.21.3

Compare Source

10.21.3

  • FIX: Fix regression that allows a snippet to be loaded outside of the base path using directory traversal when
    restrict_base_path is enabled (the default). Found by @​gistrec.

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • ""
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate Bot requested a review from seapagan as a code owner May 19, 2026 21:36
@renovate renovate Bot added the dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file label May 19, 2026
@codacy-production
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codacy-production Bot commented May 19, 2026

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

🟢 Metrics 0 complexity · 0 duplication

Metric Results
Complexity 0
Duplication 0

View in Codacy

🟢 Coverage ∅ diff coverage · +0.00% coverage variation

Metric Results
Coverage variation +0.00% coverage variation (-1.00%)
Diff coverage diff coverage

View coverage diff in Codacy

Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (41298bd) 2524 2524 100.00%
Head commit (3fa00df) 2524 (+0) 2524 (+0) 100.00% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#849) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants