docs: add node repair candidate resolution, admission, and escalation RFC - #2
Draft
sebpalmerio wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
sebpalmerio
force-pushed
the
node-repair-candidate-resolution-admission-escalation-rfc
branch
from
August 27, 2026 07:05
d29bb7b to
ed46c80
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR adds a design RFC (
designs/node-repair-candidate-resolution-admission-and-escalation.md) defining candidate resolution, shared disruption admission, durable commitment, and post-reboot action resolution for Karpenter Node Repair.Problem
Reason-aware matching can produce several eligible repair results for one Node, potentially with different actions and drain bounds. Repair may then wait behind voluntary disruption controls while health changes. Reboot adds a provider side effect that must survive controller restart and must not create an autonomous reboot loop. Karpenter needs one deterministic candidate, a clear commitment boundary, and durable attempt history without persisting reconstructible recommendations.
Proposal
NodeClaim.status.repairAttemptbefore provider side effects, while replacement commits through NodeClaim deletion.Related RFCs
How was this change tested?
N/A — documentation/design only.
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
LLMs were used in the writing of this document, but the contribution is mine.