-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 824
Call antehandlers for traceBlock #2139
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
e6ea1c7
to
ce7d076
Compare
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2139 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 62.38% 62.27% -0.11%
==========================================
Files 293 295 +2
Lines 28937 29132 +195
==========================================
+ Hits 18052 18142 +90
- Misses 9556 9649 +93
- Partials 1329 1341 +12
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
09c8298
to
c84d9d7
Compare
go func() { | ||
<-app.httpServerStartSignal | ||
if err := evmHTTPServer.Start(); err != nil { | ||
panic(err) | ||
} | ||
}() |
Check notice
Code scanning / CodeQL
Spawning a Go routine Note
go func() { | ||
<-app.wsServerStartSignal | ||
if err := evmWSServer.Start(); err != nil { | ||
panic(err) | ||
} | ||
}() |
Check notice
Code scanning / CodeQL
Spawning a Go routine Note
f3622cd
to
d763001
Compare
d763001
to
1157e76
Compare
Describe your changes and provide context
There were two issues with how antehandlers are invoked during tracing:
debug_traceBlock...
endpoints, which would specifically cause absence of address associationTesting performed to validate your change
patched on archive node