Skip to content

docs(renovate-branches): define decision to not build renovate branches in test workflows#5

Open
travi wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
adrs/renovate-branches
Open

docs(renovate-branches): define decision to not build renovate branches in test workflows#5
travi wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
adrs/renovate-branches

Conversation

@travi

@travi travi commented Nov 17, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

initially implemented with semantic-release/github#306

while this may already be a decision that we end up changing, based on #3 (comment), we can follow up with another record that supersedes this decision

@travi travi requested a review from gr2m November 17, 2020 06:15

@HonkingGoose HonkingGoose left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I found some small things, that you might want to improve before you merge.

Comment thread architecture-decisions/0002-avoid-building-renovate-branches.md Outdated
Comment thread architecture-decisions/0002-avoid-building-renovate-branches.md Outdated

In order for renovate PR branches to be built in isolation, they could be
included in the list under the `push` trigger in the test workflow as
`renovate/**`. However, that would result in duplication for the builds

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we might soon revert the decision as it looks like we will enable automergeType:branch as discussed at #3

If now pull requests are created, we will have to enable builds on push for the renovate branches

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yep, understood. just thought it would be a decent example of making a decision and later making a super-ceding decision. mostly just going through the motions, so i'm cool if we want to skip this one as wasteful

Co-authored-by: HonkingGoose <34918129+HonkingGoose@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants