yarn upgrade --latest && yarn build

[sensuikan1973]

Auto-generated by create-pull-request

---

See: https://github.com/peter-evans/create-pull-request/blob/master/docs/concepts-guidelines.md#triggering-further-workflow-runs

[gemini-code-assist]

Hello @sensuikan1973, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

Hello team, gemini-code-assist here with a summary of this pull request. This PR appears to be an automated update generated by the create-pull-request GitHub action. Its primary purpose is to update the project's dependencies to their latest versions using yarn upgrade --latest and then run the build process via yarn build. The changes are confined to the website/yarn.lock file, reflecting the updated dependency tree.

Highlights

• Automated Dependency Update: This PR was automatically generated to update project dependencies to their latest versions.
• Yarn Lock File Changes: The core changes are in the website/yarn.lock file, reflecting the specific versions and integrity hashes of the updated packages.
• Build Verification: The automated process includes running yarn build after the upgrade, suggesting the PR aims to ensure the project still builds successfully with the latest dependencies.

Changelog

Click here to see the changelog

• website/yarn.lock
  • Updated @types/express from 5.0.1 to 5.0.2
  • Updated @types/express (constrained to ^4.17.13) from 4.17.21 to 4.17.22
  • Updated @types/node from 22.15.18 to 22.15.21
  • Updated @types/qs from 6.9.18 to 6.14.0
  • Updated @types/react from 19.1.4 to 19.1.5
  • Updated electron-to-chromium from 1.5.155 to 1.5.157
  • Updated tapable (constrained to ^2.0.0, etc.) from 2.2.1 to 2.2.2
  • Updated watchpack from 2.4.2 to 2.4.4
  • Updated webpack-sources from 3.2.3 to 3.3.0
  • Updated webpack (constrained to ^5.88.1, etc.) from 5.99.8 to 5.99.9

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

---

Dependencies rise,
Like stars in the digital skies.
Yarn pulls them down,
Updating the town,
Ensuring the code still flies.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This PR, automatically generated by create-pull-request, updates several dependencies to their latest versions as recorded in website/yarn.lock. This is a good practice for keeping the project up-to-date with bug fixes, security patches, and new features from its dependencies.

Most updates are patch versions, which are generally safe. However, a few minor version bumps are included, with one notable jump for @types/qs.

It's crucial to ensure that these updates don't introduce any regressions:

• Please verify that all CI checks (including build and any automated tests) pass successfully.
• A quick manual check of the deployed preview or local build, particularly focusing on functionalities that might involve query string parsing (where qs could be used), would be beneficial due to the significant version jump in its type definitions.

Summary of Findings

• Significant version update for @types/qs: The @types/qs package was updated from 6.9.18 to 6.14.0. This represents a large increment in version numbers for a type definition package. It warrants careful verification to ensure no type incompatibilities or reflections of breaking changes in the underlying qs library (or the types themselves) adversely affect the project. A review comment has been added for this.
• Minor dependency updates and general testing: Other dependencies, such as webpack-sources (updated from 3.2.3 to 3.3.0), also received minor version updates. While these are generally lower risk than major updates, comprehensive testing after any set of dependency upgrades is always a best practice to catch unforeseen regressions. This was not specifically commented on due to review settings focusing on medium or higher severity issues, but it's an important general consideration.

Merge Readiness

This pull request consists of automated dependency updates. Most updates are minor patches and appear safe. However, the significant version jump for the @types/qs package (from 6.9.18 to 6.14.0) warrants careful verification, as detailed in the review comment. This is to ensure that the changes in type definitions do not mask or introduce any issues.

It is recommended to:

1. Ensure all CI checks (build, automated tests, linting, etc.) are passing.
2. Address the point raised about the @types/qs update by performing the suggested checks and verifications.

Once these steps are completed and you are confident in the stability of these updates, the PR should be in a good state for merging. As a reviewer, I am not authorized to approve pull requests. Please ensure this PR undergoes any further necessary review and approval processes established by your team before merging.

[gemini-code-assist]

The @types/qs package has been updated from version 6.9.18 to 6.14.0. This is a substantial version jump for a type definition package (from a 6.9.x series to a 6.14.x series in a short period).

While the yarn build command in the PR title suggests that compile-time type-checking likely passed, such a significant update to type definitions could potentially reflect changes in the underlying qs library's API or behavior that the types now cover, or it might be an extensive refactoring of the types themselves.

Could you please consider the following?

1. If feasible, quickly check the changelog or release notes for @types/qs (often found in the DefinitelyTyped repository or npm) to understand the nature of changes between these versions.
2. Confirm through testing (especially if your site relies on query string parsing/manipulation where qs might be used directly or transitively) that this update doesn't introduce any unexpected behavior or runtime errors.

This due diligence will help ensure that the type definitions accurately reflect the qs library version being used and that no subtle issues are introduced.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.03%. Comparing base (d659ead) to head (6a1006c).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2606   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.03%   94.03%           
=======================================
  Files          52       52           
  Lines        1476     1476           
=======================================
  Hits         1388     1388           
  Misses         88       88           

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration_test	65.44% <ø> (ø)
macos-latest	93.08% <ø> (ø)
ubuntu	93.49% <ø> (ø)
widget_test	90.38% <ø> (-0.07%)	⬇️
windows	93.49% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.