Skip to content

Conversation

@aurickq
Copy link

@aurickq aurickq commented Jan 1, 2026

Motivation

Modifications

Accuracy Tests

Benchmarking and Profiling

Checklist

Review Process

  1. Ping Merge Oncalls to start the PR flow. See the PR Merge Process.
  2. Get approvals from CODEOWNERS and other reviewers.
  3. Trigger CI tests with comments (/tag-run-ci-label, /rerun-failed-ci, /tag-and-rerun-ci) or contact authorized users to do so.
  4. After green CI and required approvals, ask Merge Oncalls to merge.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @aurickq, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a potential runtime issue where the tokenizer object might be None when creating a new session request, which could lead to errors when attempting to access tokenizer.vocab_size. The fix involves refactoring the create_req method to explicitly accept the vocab_size as an argument, which is then supplied by the scheduler using the model_config.vocab_size. This ensures that the vocab_size is always available and correctly passed, improving the stability of session request handling.

Highlights

  • Explicit Vocab Size Passing: The create_req method in session_controller.py now explicitly accepts vocab_size as an integer argument, enhancing clarity and robustness.
  • Scheduler Update: The scheduler.py file has been updated to pass self.model_config.vocab_size to the create_req method when creating a new request from an existing session.
  • Tokenizer Dependency Removal: The session_controller no longer relies on the tokenizer object to retrieve vocab_size directly, making the process more resilient to scenarios where the tokenizer might be None.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@Kangyan-Zhou
Copy link
Collaborator

/tag-and-rerun-ci

@github-actions github-actions bot added the run-ci label Jan 1, 2026
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request addresses a potential AttributeError when creating a session request if the tokenizer is None. The fix involves passing vocab_size explicitly from model_config to session.create_req, avoiding reliance on tokenizer.vocab_size. The changes are correct and well-targeted. I have one minor suggestion to add a type hint for better code clarity.

@Qiaolin-Yu
Copy link
Collaborator

/tag-and-rerun-ci

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants