Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add blog post about v0.14.0 release #137

Conversation

SaschaSchwarze0
Copy link
Member

Changes

This adds a blog post about the v0.14.0 release.

Submitter Checklist

  • Includes tests if functionality changed/was added
  • Includes docs if changes are user-facing
  • Set a kind label on this PR
  • Release notes block has been filled in, or marked NONE

Release Notes

NONE

@SaschaSchwarze0 SaschaSchwarze0 added the kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. label Nov 10, 2024
@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 10, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 10, 2024
@SaschaSchwarze0 SaschaSchwarze0 force-pushed the sascha-release-blog-post branch 2 times, most recently from 638cc4c to bba86c9 Compare November 11, 2024 06:38
@qu1queee qu1queee self-requested a review November 12, 2024 07:46
content/en/blog/posts/2024-11-15-release-v0.14.0.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
content/en/blog/posts/2024-11-15-release-v0.14.0.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
content/en/blog/posts/2024-11-15-release-v0.14.0.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@SaschaSchwarze0 SaschaSchwarze0 force-pushed the sascha-release-blog-post branch from bba86c9 to ccad5fe Compare November 13, 2024 20:12
@SaschaSchwarze0 SaschaSchwarze0 force-pushed the sascha-release-blog-post branch from ccad5fe to fd3bd73 Compare November 13, 2024 20:16
@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 13, 2024
@SaschaSchwarze0 SaschaSchwarze0 changed the title WIP Add blog post about v0.14.0 release Add blog post about v0.14.0 release Nov 13, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Nov 13, 2024
@SaschaSchwarze0 SaschaSchwarze0 added this to the release-v0.14.0 milestone Nov 13, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@qu1queee qu1queee left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 14, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: qu1queee

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 14, 2024
@qu1queee
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 14, 2024
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit fae42b2 into shipwright-io:main Nov 14, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants