Skip to content

Conversation

@paradoxxxzero
Copy link
Contributor

Same reason as for partner_sudo, on update write is done on address so we may need sudo too.

@paradoxxxzero paradoxxxzero marked this pull request as ready for review April 8, 2025 14:20
@lmignon
Copy link
Collaborator

lmignon commented May 13, 2025

@paradoxxxzero In which context? Can you add a test to reproduce the error?

@paradoxxxzero
Copy link
Contributor Author

One stacktrace says more than a thousand words:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  (...)
  File "/env/lib/python3.10/site-packages/anyio/_backends/_asyncio.py", line 967, in run
    result = context.run(func, *args)
  File "/odoo/links/shopinvader_api_address/routers/address_service.py", line 92, in update_invoicing_address
    address = helper._update_address(data, "invoicing", address_id)
  File "/odoo/links/shopinvader_api_address/routers/address_service.py", line 236, in _update_address
    updated_address = partner_sudo._update_shopinvader_invoicing_address(
  File "/odoo/links/shopinvader_address/models/res_partner.py", line 92, in _update_shopinvader_invoicing_address
    address.write(vals)
  File "/odoo/src/addons/base_vat/models/res_partner.py", line 674, in write
    return super(ResPartner, self).write(values)
  File "/odoo/links/partner_event/models/res_partner.py", line 38, in write
    res = super(ResPartner, self).write(data)
  File "/odoo/links/partner_contact_address_default/models/res_partner.py", line 50, in write
    return super().write(vals)
  File "/odoo/src/odoo/addons/base/models/res_partner.py", line 582, in write
    result = result and super(Partner, self).write(vals)
  File "/odoo/src/addons/mail/models/mail_activity.py", line 788, in write
    return super(MailActivityMixin, self).write(vals)
  File "/odoo/src/addons/mail/models/mail_thread.py", line 319, in write
    self._prepare_tracking(self._fields)
  File "/odoo/src/addons/mail/models/mail_thread.py", line 527, in _prepare_tracking
    values.setdefault(fname, record[fname])
  File "/odoo/src/odoo/models.py", line 5716, in __getitem__
    return self._fields[key].__get__(self, type(self))
  File "/odoo/src/odoo/fields.py", line 3156, in __get__
    return super().__get__(records, owner)
  File "/odoo/src/odoo/fields.py", line 2493, in __get__
    return super().__get__(records, owner)
  File "/odoo/src/odoo/fields.py", line 1021, in __get__
    record._fetch_field(self)
  File "/odoo/src/odoo/models.py", line 3078, in _fetch_field
    self._read(fnames)
  File "/odoo/src/odoo/models.py", line 3182, in _read
    field.read(fetched)
  File "/odoo/src/odoo/fields.py", line 3167, in read
    lines = comodel.search(domain, limit=self.limit)
  File "/odoo/src/odoo/models.py", line 1712, in search
    res = self._search(args, offset=offset, limit=limit, order=order, count=count)
  File "/odoo/src/odoo/models.py", line 4532, in _search
    model.check_access_rights('read')
  File "/odoo/src/odoo/models.py", line 3348, in check_access_rights
    return self.env['ir.model.access'].check(self._name, operation, raise_exception)
  File "/env/lib/python3.10/site-packages/decorator.py", line 232, in fun
    return caller(func, *(extras + args), **kw)
  File "/odoo/src/odoo/tools/cache.py", line 90, in lookup
    value = d[key] = self.method(*args, **kwargs)
  File "/odoo/src/odoo/addons/base/models/ir_model.py", line 1829, in check
    raise AccessError(msg)
odoo.exceptions.AccessError: Vous n'êtes pas autorisé à accéder aux enregistrements 'Bank Statement Label' (account.statement.label).

Fine tuning of ACL is hard on partners, a lot of modules add functionality that requires read everywhere, and I don’t think we want to give access to Bank Statement Labels to the API user.

@sebastienbeau sebastienbeau added this to the 16.0 milestone Jun 2, 2025
@paradoxxxzero paradoxxxzero force-pushed the 16.0-fix-shopinvader_api_address-acl branch from ee59373 to c47586c Compare September 1, 2025 10:20
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 1, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 94.90%. Comparing base (766c202) to head (17f507c).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             16.0    #1584   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.89%   94.90%           
=======================================
  Files         514      514           
  Lines       10665    10668    +3     
  Branches      547      547           
=======================================
+ Hits        10121    10124    +3     
  Misses        392      392           
  Partials      152      152           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@paradoxxxzero paradoxxxzero force-pushed the 16.0-fix-shopinvader_api_address-acl branch from c47586c to 67057ba Compare September 4, 2025 13:39
@paradoxxxzero paradoxxxzero force-pushed the 16.0-fix-shopinvader_api_address-acl branch from 67057ba to 17f507c Compare September 4, 2025 13:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants