Skip to content

Remove HashMap workarounds#467

Merged
Shatur merged 1 commit into
bevy-0.16-devfrom
remove-hashmap-workarounds
Apr 22, 2025
Merged

Remove HashMap workarounds#467
Shatur merged 1 commit into
bevy-0.16-devfrom
remove-hashmap-workarounds

Conversation

@Shatur
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@Shatur Shatur commented Apr 19, 2025

During the migration to 0.16, I added a few workarounds related to hashbrown to make the code compile.
These issues have been fixed in the latest Bevy RC: bevyengine/bevy#18694
So we can now remove those workarounds.

During the migration to 0.16, I added a few workarounds related to `hashbrown` to make the code compile.
These issues have been fixed in the latest Bevy RC: bevyengine/bevy#18694
So we can now remove those workarounds.
@Shatur Shatur requested a review from UkoeHB April 19, 2025 11:29
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Apr 19, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 79.87%. Comparing base (cb714eb) to head (2cb12d0).
Report is 1 commits behind head on bevy-0.16-dev.

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff               @@
##           bevy-0.16-dev     #467   +/-   ##
==============================================
  Coverage          79.87%   79.87%           
==============================================
  Files                 52       52           
  Lines               2768     2768           
==============================================
  Hits                2211     2211           
  Misses               557      557           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Shatur Shatur merged commit c86d73e into bevy-0.16-dev Apr 22, 2025
8 checks passed
@Shatur Shatur deleted the remove-hashmap-workarounds branch April 22, 2025 07:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants