-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
LAT pointing model and ffp updates #1216
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I only looked at pointing_model.py for now -- please remove all the reformatting of code you didn't change.
Also please don't hardcode the model parameters. Those should default to zero (and that would ideally correspond to the trivial pointing model).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Basically I'd like to converge this a bit better with the SAT model and params ... and take an opportunity to decide how we want to think about those (xi, eta) "offsets".
…2radian hardcoded in lat model.
Saianeesh and I are on board with switching to the (-xi, -el) formalism, which would appear in the code with adding tildes in front of the xieta rotations. I suggest reconstructing the parameters as follows: B. C. D. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Exciting times! Just minor comments.
sotodlib/coords/pointing_model.py
Outdated
- mir_center_{xi,eta}0: The (xi,eta) coordinate in the El-structure-centered | ||
focal plane about which any mirror misalignment rotates. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't understand this last description.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let me know if the latest update makes more sense. Will try to make diagrams for all these things soon, but image I attach you to M2 and rigidly tilt the M1+M2 system as a unit, you will see one point stay fixed.
In reality its more complicated than that, M1 and M2 tilt independently about their internal origins but that adds up to an effective offset of the system on sky which can be reproduced by a joint tilt about some effective origin.
No description provided.