fix: render agent_description in SQL prompt template

[Br1an67]

• Closes agent.description (System Prompt) is dead-code #1853
• Tests added and passed if fixing a bug or adding a new feature.
• All code checks passed.

Summary

The SQL code generation template never rendered the agent_description stored in memory, making the description parameter passed to Agent() a no-op when using SQL mode. The Python template includes this description at the top, but the SQL template did not.

Changes

Added agent_description rendering at the top of generate_python_code_with_sql.tmpl, consistent with the Python template.

Files changed:

• pandasai/core/prompts/templates/generate_python_code_with_sql.tmpl — added agent_description block
• tests/unit_tests/core/prompts/test_generate_python_code_with_sql_prompt.py — added tests for description rendering

---

Important

Fixes bug by rendering agent_description in SQL prompts, ensuring description parameter is effective.

• Behavior:
  • Fixes bug where agent_description was not rendered in SQL prompts, making description parameter ineffective.
  • Adds agent_description rendering to generate_python_code_with_sql.tmpl.
• Tests:
  • Adds test_template_renders_agent_description in test_generate_python_code_with_sql_prompt.py to verify description rendering.
  • Adds test_template_no_description_when_none to ensure no rendering when agent_description is None.

^{This description was created by for bfda9db. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[ellipsis-dev]

Important

Looks good to me! 👍

Reviewed everything up to bfda9db in 7 seconds. Click for details.

• Reviewed 72 lines of code in 2 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 0 draft comments. View those below.
• Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.

Workflow ID: wflow_KPudFeNbCAj0U7DJ

^{You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.}