Make the license more obvious per #104#484
Open
earth2marsh wants to merge 1 commit intosintaxi:masterfrom
Open
Make the license more obvious per #104#484earth2marsh wants to merge 1 commit intosintaxi:masterfrom
earth2marsh wants to merge 1 commit intosintaxi:masterfrom
Conversation
Owner
|
Thanks for taking the time to send a PR. The term "MIT License" doesn't mean anything from a legal standpoint and the license is a legal document so I don't see adding it to the license as a very good practice as it could mislead people into thinking the license is something that it is not. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Without a LICENSE file, the only current declaration of the applicable license is in package.json. Being explicit in the readme will help people quickly understand what the license.