Skip to content

Conversation

@Yexiu-PPIO
Copy link

Add a now cloud provider: PPIO

Tested (run the relevant ones):

  • Code formatting: install pre-commit (auto-check on commit) or bash format.sh
  • Any manual or new tests for this PR (please specify below)
  • All smoke tests: /smoke-test (CI) or pytest tests/test_smoke.py (local)
  • Relevant individual tests: /smoke-test -k test_name (CI) or pytest tests/test_smoke.py::test_name (local)
  • Backward compatibility: /quicktest-core (CI) or pytest tests/smoke_tests/test_backward_compat.py (local)

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @Yexiu-PPIO, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces PPIO as a new cloud provider within SkyPilot, expanding the platform's capabilities to include GPU instance provisioning and management on the PPIO infrastructure. The changes encompass the addition of PPIO-specific adaptors, catalog fetching mechanisms, authentication handlers, and a dedicated provisioner for managing instance lifecycles. A new Ray cluster template is provided to leverage PPIO's unique configuration options. The integration also clearly defines current limitations, such as the lack of support for spot instances, multi-node clusters, and advanced storage features, ensuring users have a clear understanding of the available functionalities.

Highlights

  • New Cloud Provider Integration: PPIO has been added as a new cloud provider, enabling SkyPilot to provision and manage GPU instances on the PPIO platform.
  • PPIO Adaptor and Catalog: Dedicated modules (sky/adaptors/ppio.py, sky/catalog/ppio_catalog.py) and a data fetching script (sky/catalog/data_fetchers/fetch_ppio.py) have been introduced to handle PPIO-specific API interactions, instance type cataloging, and credential management.
  • Authentication and Provisioning: New functions (setup_ppio_authentication) and a provisioner (sky/provision/ppio) are implemented to manage SSH authentication (local key generation, no upload to PPIO) and instance lifecycle (run, terminate, query status).
  • Ray Cluster Template: A new Jinja2 template (sky/templates/ppio-ray.yml.j2) is added to configure Ray clusters on PPIO, supporting various PPIO-specific instance parameters like imageUrl, ports, envs, command, networkStorages, and rootfsSize.
  • Unsupported Features: The PPIO integration explicitly marks several features as unsupported, including stopping instances, multi-node clusters, spot instances, custom disk/network tiers, storage mounting, host controllers, image IDs, and Docker images, reflecting current PPIO platform limitations.
  • System-wide Integration: PPIO is integrated into SkyPilot's core components, including sky/__init__.py, sky/backends/backend_utils.py, sky/backends/cloud_vm_ray_backend.py, sky/clouds/__init__.py, sky/provision/__init__.py, sky/setup_files/dependencies.py, sky/skylet/constants.py, and sky/utils/schemas.py.
  • Test Suite Updates: Existing smoke tests are updated with pytest.mark.no_ppio for functionalities not yet supported by the PPIO integration, ensuring test compatibility and preventing failures.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces support for a new cloud provider, PPIO. The changes are comprehensive, covering authentication, backend logic, catalog fetching, and provisioning, and they align well with the existing patterns for adding new providers.

My review highlights a critical issue in the provisioning logic that would prevent instance creation, as well as a missing dependency that would break the integration. I've also included several suggestions to improve code maintainability and readability, such as refactoring repetitive code, clarifying magic numbers, and documenting hardcoded logic. Addressing these points will help ensure the PPIO integration is robust and easy to maintain.

@Yexiu-PPIO
Copy link
Author

@aylei Could I ask you to review?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant