Skip to content

Conversation

vicentevieytes
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@vicentevieytes vicentevieytes added the run-staging-monitor-test Run monitoring tests against the staging env, see staging-monitor.yml label Oct 17, 2025
@vicentevieytes vicentevieytes removed the run-staging-monitor-test Run monitoring tests against the staging env, see staging-monitor.yml label Oct 17, 2025
@vicentevieytes vicentevieytes marked this pull request as ready for review October 17, 2025 18:12
@vicentevieytes vicentevieytes requested a review from a team as a code owner October 17, 2025 18:12
@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings October 17, 2025 18:12
@vicentevieytes vicentevieytes enabled auto-merge (squash) October 17, 2025 18:13
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR reduces the gas amount used by the sender in ton2evm operations by decreasing the TON message value from 0.05 to 0.02 TON and removes logging of the wallet address during initialization.

  • Reduced TON message value from 0.05 to 0.02 TON for router messages
  • Removed wallet address logging from TON wallet initialization

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
staging-monitor/lib/constants.go Updated TONMessageValue constant from "0.05" to "0.02"
staging-monitor/lib/ton/client.go Removed wallet address logging during TON wallet initialization

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.

mc, _ := client.CurrentMasterchainInfo(ctx)
balance, _ := w.GetBalance(ctx, mc)
lggr.Infow("TON wallet initialized",
"address", w.Address().String(),
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How come you removed this label?

@vicentevieytes vicentevieytes merged commit 08b774b into main Oct 17, 2025
27 of 28 checks passed
@vicentevieytes vicentevieytes deleted the vicentevieytes-patch-1 branch October 17, 2025 21:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants