Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release/3.22.0 #1293

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 7, 2024
Merged

Release/3.22.0 #1293

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 7, 2024

Conversation

igneel64
Copy link
Contributor

@igneel64 igneel64 commented Mar 7, 2024

jethron and others added 2 commits January 31, 2024 09:07
* BrowserTracker: fix method type definitions

Per the [TypeScript
docs](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/2/functions.html#return-type-void),
functions that return values are type-compatible with functions declared
as having void return type; however if you're consuming these type
definitions this becomes annoying as you are required to cast `as
unknown as T` at the call sites to get the correct types actually
returned from these methods.
Copy link

bundlemon bot commented Mar 7, 2024

BundleMon

Files added (6)
Status Path Size Limits
libraries/browser-tracker-core/dist/index.mod
ule.js
+26.51KB 27KB / +10%
trackers/javascript-tracker/dist/sp.js
+25.1KB 25.5KB / +10%
trackers/javascript-tracker/dist/sp.lite.js
+15.4KB 16KB / +10%
trackers/browser-tracker/dist/index.umd.min.j
s
+15.29KB 15.5KB / +10%
libraries/tracker-core/dist/index.module.js
+13.36KB 15KB / +10%
trackers/browser-tracker/dist/index.module.js
+3.51KB 5KB / +10%

Total files change +99.17KB 0%

Final result: ✅

View report in BundleMon website ➡️


Current branch size history

@igneel64 igneel64 requested a review from matus-tomlein March 7, 2024 10:28
Copy link
Contributor

@matus-tomlein matus-tomlein left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

"changes": [
{
"packageName": "@snowplow/browser-tracker-core",
"comment": "",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it a problem that there is no comment in these changes?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@igneel64 igneel64 Mar 7, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will be used in the generated changelog (which I think we don't use anyway)
I don't think the empty entry will make a difference (think :P )

I don't know how it came up as well

@igneel64 igneel64 merged commit 205d651 into master Mar 7, 2024
3 checks passed
@igneel64 igneel64 deleted the release/3.22.0 branch March 7, 2024 13:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants