Skip to content

feat: ignore request command [IDE-1063] [IDE-1130] #825

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 33 commits into from
Apr 24, 2025

Conversation

acke
Copy link
Contributor

@acke acke commented Apr 8, 2025

Description

New LS command for policy CRUD operations

Operation (CREATE,UPDATE,DELETE)
ignoreId (might be empty in case of CREATE)
reason (wont-fix, not-vulnerable, temporary-ignore)
expirationDate
comment

The LS Command should trigger the GAF Ignore WF created in IDE-1058.

Enrich the cached LS Issue with the GAF Ignore WF workflow afterwards.

Send generateIssueDescription Notification to refresh the page

Checklist

  • Tests added and all succeed
  • Linted
  • README.md updated, if user-facing
  • License file updated, if new 3rd-party dependency is introduced

@acke acke force-pushed the feat/IDE-1063_ignore-request-command branch from 21bb73f to 5a9bcd8 Compare April 9, 2025 08:33
@acke acke force-pushed the feat/IDE-1063_ignore-request-command branch from 5a9bcd8 to f3c0dcc Compare April 9, 2025 09:53
@acke acke force-pushed the feat/IDE-1063_ignore-request-command branch from f3c0dcc to 2f3da48 Compare April 9, 2025 13:30
@acke acke force-pushed the feat/IDE-1063_ignore-request-command branch from 2f3da48 to 39eef13 Compare April 9, 2025 13:30
@ShawkyZ ShawkyZ changed the title feat: ignore request command [IDE-1063] feat: ignore request command [IDE-1063] [IDE-1130] Apr 24, 2025
@ShawkyZ ShawkyZ merged commit f531772 into main Apr 24, 2025
18 checks passed
@ShawkyZ ShawkyZ deleted the feat/IDE-1063_ignore-request-command branch April 24, 2025 13:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants