Skip to content

Conversation

@filip131311
Copy link
Collaborator

Now that there is a noticeable difference between experience of activated and un activated license we add a "remove license" command with two goals in mind:

  1. make it easier to test multiple setups
  2. if a user has any problem with corrupted license (which hopefully wont happen) we can point them to this command in order to replace it with a new one

How Has This Been Tested:

Screen.Recording.2025-12-05.at.15.53.55.mov

How Has This Change Been Documented:

We have quite a large trouble shooting backlog to document we will handle it all at once in a future PR

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 5, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
radon-ide Ready Ready Preview Comment Dec 5, 2025 2:59pm

@filip131311 filip131311 requested a review from jwajgelt December 5, 2025 15:01
Copy link
Member

@latekvo latekvo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thx!


export interface ProjectEventMap {
projectStateChanged: ProjectState;
licenseActivationChanged: boolean;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this change relevant to this PR?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no but i noticed it working on it. It is a dead code from previous state management approach

@filip131311 filip131311 merged commit f2f6363 into main Dec 5, 2025
9 checks passed
@filip131311 filip131311 deleted the @Filip131311/featAddRemoveLicenseCommand branch December 5, 2025 15:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants