Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 9a5daf5 in 1 minute and 5 seconds
More details
- Looked at
272lines of code in2files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
7drafted comments based on config settings.
1. .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md:9
- Draft comment:
Checklist items are clear and well-formatted. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%
None
2. .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md:34
- Draft comment:
The checklist is comprehensive. Consider if any additional checks (e.g., accessibility tests) are needed. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%
None
3. CONTRIBUTING.md:142
- Draft comment:
Review the disclosure email and bug bounty link to ensure they are up-to-date and correct. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%
This comment is asking the PR author to ensure that certain information is up-to-date and correct, which falls under the rule of not asking the author to double-check things. It doesn't provide a specific code suggestion or point out a specific issue.
4. CONTRIBUTING.md:169
- Draft comment:
The embedded PR description template is clear – excellent inclusion for consistency. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:0%<= threshold50%
None
5. .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md:42
- Draft comment:
The PR template is clear and thorough. Consider adding an optional prompt for indicating breaking changes or migration needs, which can help reviewers quickly assess potential impact. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%
None
6. CONTRIBUTING.md:142
- Draft comment:
The bug reporting section uses a placeholder URL for the bug bounty form. If an official link is available, please update it to avoid confusion. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%
None
7. CONTRIBUTING.md:156
- Draft comment:
Consider adding guidelines for commit message formatting in the Pull Request Process section to promote consistency in commit history. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Confidence changes required:33%<= threshold50%
None
Workflow ID: wflow_08wzNumcBQbkzo0G
You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Important
Add a pull request template and contributing guide to standardize contributions and ensure quality control.
PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.mdfor standardizing PR submissions.CONTRIBUTING.mdto guide contributors on project standards.This description was created by
for 9a5daf5. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.