Update t22-extension descriptions

[ngundotra]

Description

Update descriptions for t22 extensions.

Type of change

• Bug fix
• New feature
• Protocol integration
• Documentation update
• [] Other (please describe):

Screenshots

Testing

Related Issues

Checklist

• My code follows the project's style guidelines
• I have added tests that prove my fix/feature works
• All tests pass locally and in CI
• I have updated documentation as needed
• CI/CD checks pass
• I have included screenshots for protocol screens (if applicable)
• For security-related features, I have included links to related information

Additional Notes

---

Important

Update descriptions and tooltips for various token extensions in TokenExtensionsCard.tsx.

• Descriptions Updated:
  • Added description and tooltip for metadataPointer, confidentialTransferMint, interestBearingConfig, transferFeeConfig, and tokenMetadata in populatePartialParsedTokenExtension().
  • Removed description and tooltip for confidentialTransferFeeConfig in populatePartialParsedTokenExtension().
• External Links:
  • Updated external link for metadataPointer and tokenMetadata to use populateSolanaDevelopersLink('metadata-pointer').
• Misc:
  • Added break statement for default case in populatePartialParsedTokenExtension().

^{This description was created by for 09a9a5e. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
explorer	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Apr 8, 2025 7:01pm

[ellipsis-dev]

👍 Looks good to me! Reviewed everything up to 09a9a5e in 2 minutes and 18 seconds

More details

• Looked at 94 lines of code in 1 files
• Skipped 0 files when reviewing.
• Skipped posting 10 drafted comments based on config settings.

1. app/components/account/TokenExtensionsCard.tsx:177

• Draft comment:
  In the 'metadataPointer' case, the external link was changed from 'token-extensions-metadata' to 'metadata-pointer' and a description & tooltip were added. Please confirm that this updated URL is correct and documents the intended metadata pointer.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50%
  The comment is asking the PR author to confirm the correctness of a URL change, which violates the rule against asking for confirmation of intention or correctness. It does not provide a specific suggestion or point out a clear issue with the code.

2. app/components/account/TokenExtensionsCard.tsx:212

• Draft comment:
  The 'confidentialTransferFeeConfig' case no longer includes a description or tooltip unlike similar extension cases. Consider adding a brief description to maintain consistency.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

3. app/components/account/TokenExtensionsCard.tsx:232

• Draft comment:
  The 'confidentialTransferMint' extension now clearly defines a description and tooltip. This update looks consistent with other similar cases, but please verify that the description accurately reflects its functionality.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50%
  This comment is asking the PR author to verify the accuracy of a description, which falls under the category of asking for confirmation or verification. This is against the rules provided.

4. app/components/account/TokenExtensionsCard.tsx:272

• Draft comment:
  The 'tokenMetadata' case now uses the URL 'metadata-pointer' for external links, matching the 'metadataPointer' update. Please confirm that this link is correct in the updated documentation context.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

5. app/components/account/TokenExtensionsCard.tsx:295

• Draft comment:
  The PR description mentions resolving issue 123 (transaction history for deleted accounts), yet the changes here only update token extension descriptions. Please verify that the correct issue is referenced in the PR description.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

6. app/components/account/TokenExtensionsCard.tsx:177

• Draft comment:
  Metadata Pointer: The updated description and external link ('metadata-pointer') look correct. Please double-check that the new link accurately points to the intended documentation.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50%
  This comment is asking the PR author to double-check something, which is against the rules. It doesn't provide a specific suggestion or point out a clear issue with the code.

7. app/components/account/TokenExtensionsCard.tsx:212

• Draft comment:
  Confidential Transfer Fee Config: The description and tooltip have been removed. Verify if omitting these fields is intentional for consistency with other cases.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

8. app/components/account/TokenExtensionsCard.tsx:232

• Draft comment:
  Confidential Transfer Mint: The new description starts with 'Allow' – consider changing it to 'Allows' for grammatical consistency with other descriptions.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50%
  While the comment is technically correct about the inconsistency, and it's true that other descriptions use "Allows", this is a very minor grammatical issue. The meaning is perfectly clear either way. The rules state not to make comments that are obvious or unimportant. This seems like a trivial change that doesn't meaningfully impact code quality.
  The inconsistency could be seen as a small code quality issue, and fixing it would make the codebase more polished. The comment provides a specific suggestion for how to fix it.
  While consistency is good, this is too minor of an issue to warrant a PR comment. It doesn't affect functionality or meaningful code quality.
  Delete this comment as it addresses too trivial of an issue to be worth a PR comment.

9. app/components/account/TokenExtensionsCard.tsx:272

• Draft comment:
  Token Metadata: The external link has been updated from 'token-extensions-metadata' to 'metadata-pointer'. Confirm that this change is intentional and that the link still correct for token metadata documentation.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment was not on a location in the diff, so it can't be submitted as a review comment.

10. app/components/account/TokenExtensionsCard.tsx:299

• Draft comment:
  PR Context: The PR title and description indicate 'Update t22-extension descriptions', yet the issue referenced (transaction history for deleted accounts) doesn’t seem to be addressed by these changes. Please update the PR description to accurately reflect the changes made.
• Reason this comment was not posted:
  Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful = 0% <= threshold 50%
  This comment is asking the PR author to update the PR description, which is against the rules. The comment does not provide any specific code suggestions or ask for tests to be written. It is purely about the PR description, which should not be assumed to be filled out.

Workflow ID: wflow_BqZgWFMABpI9U8sd

---

You can customize Ellipsis with 👍 / 👎 feedback, review rules, user-specific overrides, quiet mode, and more.