Skip to content

Conversation

@AlistairNorman
Copy link
Contributor

Previously the authorization was not being included because an optional ordered parameter was being missed. This meant the authorization was passed to the wrong parameter and not recorded. Payments made using this, at least if autocapture is set to true, would never have their transaction ids recorded. Luckily we do record transaction ids on an associated record so no data is actually lost, but any payments made while this issue was in place would need to have their response codes manually updated in order to refund or void the charges.

Previously the authorization was not being included because an optional
ordered parameter was being missed. This meant the authorization was
passed to the wrong parameter and not recorded. Payments made using
this, at least if autocapture is set to true, would never have their
transaction ids recorded. Luckily we do record transaction ids on an
associated record so no data is actually lost, but any payments made
while this issue was in place would need to have their response codes
manually updated in order to refund or void the charges.
@AlistairNorman AlistairNorman force-pushed the alistair-response-capture-authorization branch from 319ef2e to 6e5e750 Compare January 19, 2026 23:52
@adammathys adammathys merged commit 7a7c450 into solidusio-contrib:master Jan 21, 2026
2 of 62 checks passed
@AlistairNorman AlistairNorman deleted the alistair-response-capture-authorization branch January 21, 2026 18:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants