Skip to content

Skip pipe mode tests on broadcom SKUs #17552

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

developfast
Copy link
Contributor

@developfast developfast commented Mar 17, 2025

Description of PR

Summary: Skip pipe mode tests on broadcom SKUs after flipping to pipe mode on other SKUs - sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#21868
Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

  • Bug fix
  • Testbed and Framework(new/improvement)
  • New Test case
    • Skipped for non-supported platforms
  • Test case improvement

Back port request

  • 202012
  • 202205
  • 202305
  • 202311
  • 202405
  • 202411

Approach

What is the motivation for this PR?

How did you do it?

How did you verify/test it?

Any platform specific information?

Supported testbed topology if it's a new test case?

Documentation

@mssonicbld
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@developfast developfast changed the title Skip uniform mode tests on broadcom SKUs Skip pipe mode tests on broadcom SKUs Mar 17, 2025
@kperumalbfn
Copy link
Collaborator

/azp run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

mssonicbld added a commit to mssonicbld/sonic-buildimage that referenced this pull request May 27, 2025
…NEL_ATTR_DECAP_QOS_DSCP_TO_TC_MAP

<!--
     Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines:
     https://github.com/Azure/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md

     ** Make sure all your commits include a signature generated with `git commit -s` **

     If this is a bug fix, make sure your description includes "fixes #xxxx", or
     "closes #xxxx" or "resolves #xxxx"

     Please provide the following information:
-->

#### Why I did it
To be ready for 202505 cutoff
Support for pipe mode in IPIP packets when decapped - request from NetScan. Current support is for all platforms except broadcom SKUs. SAI attribute `SAI_TUNNEL_ATTR_DECAP_QOS_DSCP_TO_TC_MAP` will be used since the `decap_dscp_to_tc_map` key is set in the template.

##### Work item tracking
- Microsoft ADO **(number only)**:

#### How I did it

#### How to verify it
Ran template change on a lab device.
```
# template
...
{% if "broadcom" in asic_type %}
            "dscp_mode":"uniform",
{% else %}
            "dscp_mode":"pipe",
            "decap_dscp_to_tc_map":"AZURE",
...

# output
{
        "TUNNEL_DECAP_TABLE:IPINIP_TUNNEL" : {
            "tunnel_type":"IPINIP",
            "dscp_mode":"uniform",
            "ecn_mode":"copy_from_outer",
            "ttl_mode":"pipe"
        },
        "OP": "SET"
    },
```

Related sonic-mgmt test change - [sonic-net#17552](sonic-net/sonic-mgmt#17552)
<!--
If PR needs to be backported, then the PR must be tested against the base branch and the earliest backport release branch and provide tested image version on these two branches. For example, if the PR is requested for master, 202211 and 202012, then the requester needs to provide test results on master and 202012.
-->

#### Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

<!--
- Note we only backport fixes to a release branch, *not* features!
- Please also provide a reason for the backporting below.
- e.g.
- [x] 202006
-->

- [ ] 201811
- [ ] 201911
- [ ] 202006
- [ ] 202012
- [ ] 202106
- [ ] 202111
- [ ] 202205
- [ ] 202211
- [ ] 202305

#### Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

<!--
- Please provide tested image version
- e.g.
- [x] 20201231.100
-->

- [ ] <!-- image version 1 -->
- [ ] <!-- image version 2 -->

#### Description for the changelog
<!--
Write a short (one line) summary that describes the changes in this
pull request for inclusion in the changelog:
-->
Migrate dscp decap mode to pipe for all platforms except broadcom skus
<!--
 Ensure to add label/tag for the feature raised. example - PR#2174 under sonic-utilities repo. where, Generic Config and Update feature has been labelled as GCU.
-->

#### Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes
<!--
Provide a link to config_db schema for the table for which YANG model
is defined
Link should point to correct section on https://github.com/Azure/sonic-buildimage/blob/master/src/sonic-yang-models/doc/Configuration.md
-->

#### A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)
mssonicbld added a commit to sonic-net/sonic-buildimage that referenced this pull request May 28, 2025
…NEL_ATTR_DECAP_QOS_DSCP_TO_TC_MAP (#22715)

<!--
 Please make sure you've read and understood our contributing guidelines:
 https://github.com/Azure/SONiC/blob/gh-pages/CONTRIBUTING.md

 failure_prs.log Make sure all your commits include a signature generated with `git commit -s` **

 If this is a bug fix, make sure your description includes "fixes #xxxx", or
 "closes #xxxx" or "resolves #xxxx"

 Please provide the following information:
-->

#### Why I did it
To be ready for 202505 cutoff
Support for pipe mode in IPIP packets when decapped - request from NetScan. Current support is for all platforms except broadcom SKUs. SAI attribute `SAI_TUNNEL_ATTR_DECAP_QOS_DSCP_TO_TC_MAP` will be used since the `decap_dscp_to_tc_map` key is set in the template.

##### Work item tracking
- Microsoft ADO **(number only)**:

#### How I did it

#### How to verify it
Ran template change on a lab device.
```
# template
...
{% if "broadcom" in asic_type %}
 "dscp_mode":"uniform",
{% else %}
 "dscp_mode":"pipe",
 "decap_dscp_to_tc_map":"AZURE",
...

# output
{
 "TUNNEL_DECAP_TABLE:IPINIP_TUNNEL" : {
 "tunnel_type":"IPINIP",
 "dscp_mode":"uniform",
 "ecn_mode":"copy_from_outer",
 "ttl_mode":"pipe"
 },
 "OP": "SET"
 },
```

Related sonic-mgmt test change - [#17552](sonic-net/sonic-mgmt#17552)
<!--
If PR needs to be backported, then the PR must be tested against the base branch and the earliest backport release branch and provide tested image version on these two branches. For example, if the PR is requested for master, 202211 and 202012, then the requester needs to provide test results on master and 202012.
-->

#### Which release branch to backport (provide reason below if selected)

<!--
- Note we only backport fixes to a release branch, *not* features!
- Please also provide a reason for the backporting below.
- e.g.
- [x] 202006
-->

- [ ] 201811
- [ ] 201911
- [ ] 202006
- [ ] 202012
- [ ] 202106
- [ ] 202111
- [ ] 202205
- [ ] 202211
- [ ] 202305

#### Tested branch (Please provide the tested image version)

<!--
- Please provide tested image version
- e.g.
- [x] 20201231.100
-->

- [ ] <!-- image version 1 -->
- [ ] <!-- image version 2 -->

#### Description for the changelog
<!--
Write a short (one line) summary that describes the changes in this
pull request for inclusion in the changelog:
-->
Migrate dscp decap mode to pipe for all platforms except broadcom skus
<!--
 Ensure to add label/tag for the feature raised. example - PR#2174 under sonic-utilities repo. where, Generic Config and Update feature has been labelled as GCU.
-->

#### Link to config_db schema for YANG module changes
<!--
Provide a link to config_db schema for the table for which YANG model
is defined
Link should point to correct section on https://github.com/Azure/sonic-buildimage/blob/master/src/sonic-yang-models/doc/Configuration.md
-->

#### A picture of a cute animal (not mandatory but encouraged)
@@ -1728,10 +1728,17 @@ qos/test_qos_dscp_mapping.py::TestQoSSaiDSCPQueueMapping_IPIP_Base::test_dscp_to
reason: "Pipe decap mode not supported due to either SAI or platform limitation / M* topo does not support qos"
conditions_logical_operator: or
conditions:
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you also check for Vxlan decap tests?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants