[aap_containerized] collect podman inspect logs

[snagoor]

---

Please place an 'X' inside each '[]' to confirm you adhere to our Contributor Guidelines

• Is the commit message split over multiple lines and hard-wrapped at 72 characters?
• Is the subject and message clear and concise?
• Does the subject start with [plugin_name] if submitting a plugin patch or a [section_name] if part of the core sosreport code?
• Does the commit contain a Signed-off-by: First Lastname email@example.com?
• Are any related Issues or existing PRs properly referenced via a Closes (Issue) or Resolved (PR) line?
• Are all passwords or private data gathered by this PR obfuscated?

[packit-as-a-service]

Congratulations! One of the builds has completed. 🍾

You can install the built RPMs by following these steps:

• sudo yum install -y dnf-plugins-core on RHEL 8
• sudo dnf install -y dnf-plugins-core on Fedora
• dnf copr enable packit/sosreport-sos-4064
• And now you can install the packages.

Please note that the RPMs should be used only in a testing environment.

[arif-ali]

You are removing podman logs and adding podman inspect, should we not collect both?

I don't know enough about podman, this is where I need to be educated :)

[arif-ali]

please ensure that the characters on this line are no more than 79 characters

[snagoor]

ack

[arif-ali]

any reason why you're changing this? I'm no RH expert, but if the RH folks have any automation against the old filename or people are looking for the old name, then this shouldn't change

[snagoor]

@arif-ali this is just a place-holder directory. It never mattered and i incorrectly named initially as aap_containers_log instead of aap_container_logs which sounds more logical.

[snagoor]

You are removing podman logs and adding podman inspect, should we not collect both?

I don't know enough about podman, this is where I need to be educated :)

If you observe the change we do collect both podman logs and podman inspect within the same for loop.

[arif-ali]

You are removing podman logs and adding podman inspect, should we not collect both?
I don't know enough about podman, this is where I need to be educated :)

If you observe the change we do collect both podman logs and podman inspect within the same for loop.

you're right, I totally saw through the change, my bad

[arif-ali]

lgtm

[arif-ali]

btw, have you tried the runas parameter, that could help without having to use su - {username} on all these commands

[snagoor]

btw, have you tried the runas parameter, that could help without having to use su - {username} on all these commands

I tried it initially, it never worked for me. Same was discussed here #4030 (comment) @TurboTurtle said he will look into it later.

[TurboTurtle]

I tried it initially, it never worked for me. Same was discussed here #4030 (comment) @TurboTurtle said he will look into it later.

The issue there was using runas in conjunction with container - we don't currently introspect non-root container states, which is what throws that off. I think this should work with just runas, but I won't block on that here since we'd ultimately want both of those working together, and doing a partial "fix" now would still need to be replaced.

I'm hoping to have some time in the next month or so to get non-root container introspection hooked up.