TST: New api 2

[nden]

JWST regression tests: https://github.com/spacetelescope/RegressionTests/actions/runs/20268196432
Roman regression tests: https://github.com/spacetelescope/RegressionTests/actions/runs/20270632739/job/58206279655
The failing Roman test matches the failure on main.

The romanisim failure is due to a mixup of units in romanisim and galsim. This PR enforces unit conversion and revealed the issue. Fix is in spacetelescope/romanisim#290

This is an alternative to #660. #660 ensures the return type is the same as the input type but does not allow using high level objects (HLO) with the legacy functions. This PR removes the restriction. A summary:

type of inputs	#660	#662
numerical	Return numbers	Return numbers.
quantities	Return quantities	Return quantities
HLO.	Raise an error	Return HLO.

A typical example showing the difference between the two PRs is below. Note that HLO is by definition the type defined in wcs.world_axis_object_components.

from gwcs import examples
w=examples.gwcs_with_pipeline_celestial()
w.forward_transform.uses_quantity
Out[3]: True

sky=w.pixel_to_world(1,1)
print(sky) # HLO is defined as Quantities
[<Quantity 3620. arcsec>, <Quantity 61200. arcsec>]

With #660

w.invert(*sky)
TypeError: High Level objects are not supported with the native API.                        
Please use the `world_to_pixel` method.

With #662

w.invert(*sky)
(<Quantity 1. pix>, <Quantity 1. pix>)

Example 2:

w=examples.gwcs_spec_cel_time_4d()
w.forward_transform.uses_quantity
Out[16]: False

world=w.pixel_to_world(1,1,1,1)
print(world)
[<SpectralCoord 5.2 m>, <SkyCoord (ICRS): (ra, dec) in deg
    (5.62930741, -72.0499035)>, <Time object: scale='utc' format='isot' value=2010-01-01T00:00:01.000>]

With #660

w.invert(*sky)
TypeError: High Level objects are not supported with the native API.                        
Please use the `world_to_pixel` method.

With #662

w.invert(*world)
Out[19]: (<Quantity 1. pix>, <Quantity 1. pix>, <Quantity 1. pix>, <Quantity 1. pix>)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 89.77273% with 9 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 86.19%. Comparing base (07a7538) to head (26f031e).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
gwcs/wcs/_wcs.py	90.14%	7 Missing ⚠️
gwcs/coordinate_frames/_base.py	66.66%	1 Missing ⚠️
gwcs/utils.py	75.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #662   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.18%   86.19%           
=======================================
  Files          39       39           
  Lines        4111     4150   +39     
=======================================
+ Hits         3543     3577   +34     
- Misses        568      573    +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.