Roman catalog detection

[jbchampagne]

This PR updates the CatalogImporter to detect ra/dec/x/y columns when there are multiple columns that satisfy the requirements to be coordinates, such as 'ra', 'ra_centroid', 'ra_err', etc. This is in preparation for Roman source catalogs which will include various quantities from the source extraction procedure, including positional uncertainties. Uncertainty or min/max columns should be excluded. The intended behavior is to default to the first (non-excluded) match. Added test coverage for input catalogs with multiple coordinate options.

Fixes #JDAT-6141

Change log entry

• Is a change log needed? If yes, is it added to CHANGES.rst? If you want to avoid merge conflicts,
  list the proposed change log here for review and add to CHANGES.rst before merge. If no, maintainer
  should add a no-changelog-entry-needed label.

Checklist for package maintainer(s)

This checklist is meant to remind the package maintainer(s) who will review this pull request of some common things to look for. This list is not exhaustive.

• Are two approvals required? Branch protection rule does not check for the second approval. If a second approval is not necessary, please apply the trivial label.
• Do the proposed changes actually accomplish desired goals? Also manually run the affected example notebooks, if necessary.
• Do the proposed changes follow the STScI Style Guides?
• Are tests added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the STScI Style Guides?
• Are docs added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the STScI Style Guides?
• If new remote data is added that uses MAST, is the URI added to the cache-download.yml workflow?
• Did the CI pass? If not, are the failures related?
• Is a milestone set? Set this to bugfix milestone if this is a bug fix and needs to be released ASAP; otherwise, set this to the next major release milestone. Bugfix milestone also needs an accompanying backport label.
• After merge, any internal documentations need updating (e.g., JIRA, Innerspace)?

[cshanahan1]

i think we may not want to exclude 'psf' here, because source positions may come from psf fitting (*whoops meant to leave this comment on the line below)

[jbchampagne]

good point, removed

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 85.15%. Comparing base (960b6e8) to head (a58c97c).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4216      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.16%   85.15%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         229      229              
  Lines       31208    31219      +11     
==========================================
+ Hits        26579    26583       +4     
- Misses       4629     4636       +7     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[cshanahan1]

looks good, approved pending confirmation that all test failures are known issues