changing name of segmentation map flux keyword - #717
Conversation
|
I think the minimum_signal and minimum_signal_units are correct in this case. You can see in the call to yaml_generator, that it contains: I see that there is a typo in that minimum_signal is misspelled, but I think that's the only change that's necessary. |
|
Hmm, maybe I'm looking at the wrong branch or misinterpreted code but when I go here: line 136 says: And line 326 says: |
|
Ah got you! I didn't read all the way down at the bottom of the page where you call |
|
Right. minimum_signal and minimum_signal_units are just random variable names that are used as inputs. Maybe I should have put a call to yaml_generator in each section of that page, to cut down on confustion. |
|
Ok, I updated this pull request to use the same segmap_flux_limit in both the description and the call to yaml_generator.SimInput for lazy people like me who can't read the whole page for find the correct docstring for the function. Up to you how to you see fit to proceed |
|
Actually, I think the only change needed is: |
|
Or yeah, you could change all instances of minimum_signal to segmap_flux_limit, and minimum_signal_units to segmap_flux_limit_units. |
|
Maybe for lazy people who don't read the whole thing like me, but you are correct and fair with segmap_flux_limit=minmum_signal -> segmap_flux_limit=minimum_signal. |
Updating the docs to the right keyword to use in the yaml generator for setting a flux limit for the segmentation map threshold.