Skip to content

Fix PR template checklist#717

Closed
pllim wants to merge 1 commit into
spacetelescope:mainfrom
pllim:fix-pr-template
Closed

Fix PR template checklist#717
pllim wants to merge 1 commit into
spacetelescope:mainfrom
pllim:fix-pr-template

Conversation

@pllim
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@pllim pllim commented Apr 27, 2026

This PR addresses PR template. No need for RT.

Tasks

  • update or add relevant tests
  • update relevant docstrings and / or docs/ page
  • Does this PR change any API used downstream? (if not, label with no-changelog-entry-needed)
    • write news fragment(s) in changes/: echo "changed something" > changes/<PR#>.<changetype>.rst (see below for change types)
    • run jwst regression tests with this branch installed ("git+https://github.com/<fork>/stdatamodels@<branch>")
news fragment change types...
  • changes/<PR#>.feature.rst: new feature
  • changes/<PR#>.bugfix.rst: fixes an issue
  • changes/<PR#>.doc.rst: documentation change
  • changes/<PR#>.removal.rst: deprecation or removal of public API
  • changes/<PR#>.misc.rst: infrastructure or miscellaneous change

@pllim pllim requested a review from a team as a code owner April 27, 2026 17:08
@pllim pllim added the no-changelog-entry-needed Trivial change that doesn't need an entry in the change log label Apr 27, 2026
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Apr 27, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.37%. Comparing base (758be1c) to head (1438dba).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #717   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.37%   90.37%           
=======================================
  Files          99       99           
  Lines        4582     4582           
=======================================
  Hits         4141     4141           
  Misses        441      441           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@pllim
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

pllim commented Apr 27, 2026

CI failures are not related.

@pllim pllim mentioned this pull request Apr 27, 2026
5 tasks
- [ ] Does this PR change any API used downstream? (if not, label with `no-changelog-entry-needed`)
- [ ] write news fragment(s) in `changes/`: `echo "changed something" > changes/<PR#>.<changetype>.rst` (see below for change types)
- [ ] [run `jwst` regression tests](https://github.com/spacetelescope/RegressionTests/actions/workflows/jwst.yml) with this branch installed (`"git+https://github.com/<fork>/stdatamodels@<branch>"`)
- [ ] [run `jwst` regression tests](https://github.com/spacetelescope/RegressionTests/actions/workflows/jwst.yml) with this branch installed (`stdatamodels@git+https://github.com/<fork>/stdatamodels@<branch>`)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I typically use the other format. Any reason to prefer this one?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Because the workflow used to explicitly recommend this version. I see that those examples are now gone. 🤷‍♀️

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since both work. Can we close this PR?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The indent is still wrong though.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't believe so. jwst is downstream here so if there are no downstream changes there's no need to run jwst regtests.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmm ok then, thx for clarification

@pllim pllim closed this Apr 27, 2026
@pllim pllim deleted the fix-pr-template branch April 27, 2026 19:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

no-changelog-entry-needed Trivial change that doesn't need an entry in the change log

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants