Resolve descriptor handling bug introduced in 0.5#6
Merged
spanishpear merged 8 commits intomainfrom Dec 2, 2025
Merged
Conversation
[email protected] Generated by cargo-workspaces
spanishpear
changed the title
nahuja2
approved these changes
Dec 1, 2025
spanishpear
commented
Dec 2, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
0.5 release caused some customers to fail - seems we dropped some handling of ranges
Thanks to the internal validator I found a few minor differences - mostly around us dropping descriptors
this PR adds a comparison to the yarnpkg parser (quick hacky script) and resolves this main issue reported.
we also add tests for backwards compat, and fix some broken fixtures.