Add ai prompt v2 - #1249
Conversation
| @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ | |||
| SPDX-License-Identifier: Community-Spec-1.0 | |||
|
|
|||
| # promptRole | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
From 8 Apr 2026 SPDX AI WG call, the property name is update pending. The group is still to decide so Elyas can update this accordingly.
Possible alternatives are:
- promptKind
- promptSource
- promptLevel
- promptClass
- promptCategory
or it can be others.
| @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ | |||
| SPDX-License-Identifier: Community-Spec-1.0 | |||
|
|
|||
| # PromptRoleType | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When possible, avoid using "-Type" suffix for term that already indicate class or category.
In this case, "Role" already implies a class/category, so it is unnecessary to repeat the notion again with "Type".
No need to change anything here btw, since we will rename the promptRole.
Signed-off-by: Arthit Suriyawongkul <arthit@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Arthit Suriyawongkul <arthit@gmail.com>
0764d9f to
1742f82
Compare
1742f82 to
3382064
Compare
Signed-off-by: Arthit Suriyawongkul <arthit@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Arthit Suriyawongkul <arthit@gmail.com>
| @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ | |||
| SPDX-License-Identifier: Community-Spec-1.0 | |||
|
|
|||
| # isContextAugmented | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
isContextAugmented is bad name.
It can have two reads:
- Is context augmented?
- Is it augmented by context?
I think about intention is (2).
May need to rename
stevenc-stb
left a comment
stevenc-stb
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
the Property of isContextAugmented -> isPromptAugmented make it clearer, see meeting notes on 2026 08 19
| @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ | |||
| SPDX-License-Identifier: Community-Spec-1.0 | |||
|
|
|||
| # isContextAugmented | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| # isContextAugmented | |
| # isPromptAugmented |
3 participants
This PR introduces newly proposed fields for the prompt class in the AI profile. Here is the related issue number, along with the discussions from the AI & Dataset group meeting.
#1247